Besides, one of important thing for future British capital ships. How many hydroplanes they carry in operation irl. Current dev-version HMS Repulse carry only one Walrus. Is it two aircraft or three aircraft did RN ships carry in operation? Theoretically there are two hangar and one catapult so three is possible, but considering hard North Sea condition, maybe can carry only two.
Well given that the north sea was not the only operating theater it might have changed depending if it was operating in the med or the north sea
The Singaporean government list her as carrying 4 when she was sunk.
Well it would make her the only British ship in game with more than one aircraft launch but almost any of the modernized BB’s had multiple planes
Float plane Vs much better AA and better protection. Still doesn’t seem worth it to me. Especially as I’m.kinda of the opinion that float plane capping needs some kind of rework and is no guarantee of a cap
Oh yeah totally ow worth it maybe my expectations were to high but I was expecting a modernized QE at a minimum
And don’t those also have a floatplane?
It was 1943 to 1944 that Royal Navy ships started to remove catapult and stop loading hydroplane on their ships. Before that, any Royal Navy capital ships except Revenge class and Hood has ability to carry hydroplane.
Yep, so a early 1940s refit of HMS QE, would have more main guns, better armour, better AA and a float plane.
Feels like Gaijin intentionally added the worst possible 7.0 they could find that also took the least amount of effort
I love how they also skipped it on both dev streams like Mike accidentally clicked on it and that was that
Of course. The royal navy is only a very minor maritime power
Well as we both know only small navel powers build 5+ battle ships per class
They are tax right offs :P
And we could put a whole class into service In under a year at peak
So from the first BB to the last of the QE and renown it was an insane 4 per year
So this is kinda insane assuming chat gpt has its numbers correct
1 Like
I’m quite curious to see how chat gpt got those numbers considering I got some that were completely different.
Only including battleships, battlecruisers, and dreadnoughts;
Germany 3.5
USA 2.7
UK 5.7
Japan 1.35 with Russian ships counting as .5 of a ship (they did have to be refloated and overhauled) 1.1 without Russian ships, .4 for ships built only in Japan | These numbers also don’t include the two proto-battlecruiser classes Japan built which would be 1.75, 1.5 and .8 respectively
Also the US and UK numbers don’t include ships built for other navies as they’d be higher and Japan would be SoL
Didn’t bother with the others because they’d be less than 1.0. Also interesting to note that aside from the Virginia (5) and Vermont (4) classes of pre-dreads, the US would build everything in batches of two until New Mexico (3).
To be more on-topic, it seems Gaijin has a bone to pick with Britain as even the Italians are getting a Queen Elizabeth before Britain (for the tech tree). Arkhangelsk next patch before Britain gets Revenge perhaps? They prefer not to add a capital ship for nations two patches in a row I think, so seems like Repulsive will be it for this year.
2 Likes
Yeah I am not 100% on the numbers it used but it should not be miles of but the main point of it was just how many ships Britain made over the years and then how few are getting added. As from hood being added they could have added a 15inch armed ship every update after and only just have run out and given that we are now entering the era with Japan getting larger caliber guns then I find it some what infuriating that in coming up on 2 years of hood being added that it is still Britains best ship in game
1 Like
I can’t wait for the Russians to get one before the British
1 Like
Knowing Gaijin, the moment the USSR gets Arkhangelsk, 15" dispersion is going to get fixed.
1 Like