Yes, I still hate the mixed matchmaking ever since it got shoved down our throat without any announcement or indication. And, despite the delusions of some that say it is now better, it wasn’t unfair and it didn’t cause any major waiting times, so there was and still is no need for it. Neutral nation like Sweden could be a joker if necessary and got to either side.
My post don’t be accepted but for me i’m wanted sim with that. When i play bhisma, ot taiwanese tanks i have 50% of that I’m killed by teammember, but if we do Sims with NATO vs WP they can play on right side… If you can take only 3 machines it is no problem to make lineup for that…
I believe this is the fix for US in Top Tier. NATO vs Warsaw pact is fine, but leave Top Tier Germany on the NATO side, otherwise wouldn’t make sense lol.
This would be the single best change I can imagine alongside enduring confrontation being made into a mode that also included tanks and had a simulator variant.
This is a pretty annoying issue. China also shows the same issue, as well as germany. Sweden too in WW2 (Finland is axis, Sweden is neutral with allied vehicles).
Best approach is making matchmaking rely on subtrees - west germany, italy, taiwan, sweden go to allies; mainland, east germany, hungary and finland go to axis(finland), warsaw (rest).
It’d also help improve sim if we could add the same logic there (you can only use vehicles within the permitted subtree).