Yeah, it’s in a weird spot right now, with a hull that is far better then it’s weapons. The gun and ATGMs are around 9.7 level and the hull is 12.0.
Buffing it’s weapons to be more inline with the hull and moving it up would be the most logical solution.
Adding APFSDS, Kornets and apparently it should have the ability to fire both barrels in short 5 or 6 sec bursts and moving it up would be appropriate IMO.
3 Likes
Copium!
On the BMPT hull have the classic weak
spot, and since the damage model is incorrect, literally anyone can easily explode the ammunition inside without direct ammo hit. And if the turret is hit anywhere with HE, the whole thing exploding too.
It’s a Gaijin’s worst nightmare to give an M2A4E Bradley with LWS APS and even with BUSK.
I simply don’t care or bother with Bradley
After i check hes stats and squadron i gived up and i no have more question xd
2 Likes
Let me guess USA main forever?
2 Likes
no its the m3a3 that sucks at 10.0
the m3 is just fine and dandy at 8.3
bingo
1 Like
Thanks
You left out the fact that those other IFVs have FnF missiles and the BMPT does not
It was 8.7 when it didn’t have APFSDS. I remember seeing those things in the Maus.
Yea absolutly with insane 0.4k/d
1 Like
Muaha, Murica strong 🤣
Throwback to when PUMA was 8.3.
2 Likes
new module? or is it stock
screenshot isnt mine
For real
30mm APDS has enough penetration to still go thru Puma’s front in many spots (surprise surprise, Puma’s armor is massively underperforming), BMP-3 and BMD-4s do it, why shouldn’t BMPT be able to?
On the other hand, BMPT is going to be REALLY hard to kill for any IFV even from the side considering the level of protection…
So… Puma armor fixes when? The thing should by all accounts not give even the smallest of damns about anything below 57mm and even that should have issues.
