The M3 Bradley is at 10.0. No fast ATGMs, no speed, and a high silhouette.
And that is why they so zealously prove that the Terminator is very weak and has vulnerable areas.
But the Bradley have APFSDS in compesation
Idk why Gaijin don’t give him UBH 2017 kit
The Bushmaster is simply terrible. Did you know that the Bushmaster can’t even penetrate the Terminator’s side? What’s the point of a gun that can’t penetrate a Soviet tank at all? But the Terminator will destroy a Bradley with a short burst, even with just two or three bullets.
Yeah, it’s in a weird spot right now, with a hull that is far better then it’s weapons. The gun and ATGMs are around 9.7 level and the hull is 12.0.
Buffing it’s weapons to be more inline with the hull and moving it up would be the most logical solution.
Adding APFSDS, Kornets and apparently it should have the ability to fire both barrels in short 5 or 6 sec bursts and moving it up would be appropriate IMO.
3 Likes
Copium!
On the BMPT hull have the classic weak
spot, and since the damage model is incorrect, literally anyone can easily explode the ammunition inside without direct ammo hit. And if the turret is hit anywhere with HE, the whole thing exploding too.
It’s a Gaijin’s worst nightmare to give an M2A4E Bradley with LWS APS and even with BUSK.
I simply don’t care or bother with Bradley
After i check hes stats and squadron i gived up and i no have more question xd
2 Likes
Let me guess USA main forever?
2 Likes
no its the m3a3 that sucks at 10.0
the m3 is just fine and dandy at 8.3
bingo
1 Like
Thanks
You left out the fact that those other IFVs have FnF missiles and the BMPT does not
It was 8.7 when it didn’t have APFSDS. I remember seeing those things in the Maus.
Yea absolutly with insane 0.4k/d
1 Like
Muaha, Murica strong 🤣
Throwback to when PUMA was 8.3.
2 Likes
new module? or is it stock