@H_ngma
T-80U has thermals, and would be a false equivalence fallacy for me to compare it to something without thermals.
Challenger 2E has vastly higher mobility than the Challenger 2 and Black Night.
Also if BMPT was introduced at a similarly OP BR as the Puma, the BMPT would currently be ~9.3.
Puma is 2BRs higher than it use to be, and is currently arguably over-BR’d.
I don’t get why you’re quoting me calling out Gaijin’s mistakes as something bad.
Me calling out Gaijin’s mistakes by empathizing with them, and wanting them to do better is something I won’t feel bad doing.
I also have to know how they made that mistake to better criticize it.
T-72B3 has Relikt as well, and has better ERA coverage than B3A.
If you’re talking UFP, then sure one has K5, but K5 isn’t as different to Relikt as you’re implying.
I never claimed that it is as under BRed as the Puma was just that’s it’s the most blatant under BR since then.
It’s a cashgrab it’s not that deep, no need to emphasize since it’s not a mistake. It’s completely obvious that it’s under BRed but it’s already selling like crazy so Gaijin did everything right from their POV.
It’s a 67% increase in KE protection. That’s an insane step up in armor
@ItsOnyy You didn’t quote any take of mine.
You quoted me repeating what I witnessed.
Witnessing things is not a take.
A take would be me saying “Spikes seem inconsistent based on what you told me and what I witnessed.”
Yeah so…
What exactly is there to say about this atp.
Literally preferential treatment for a singular vehicle, despite it being different on every single other vehicle in the entire game.
This was the initial response on the other report btw (before it was edited)
The new report disproved this utter nonsense claim with primary and secondary sources (“external belts” do not exist. There are two consecutive belts in total, there is no separation otherwise and even then half of these “external” belts are still internal).
Just for reference, here are images from the primary sources;
Even in-game the cutout for the belts/feeding system is modelled, there is literally 0 separation.
Gaijin should actually do something about the BMPT’s… Queue times are too long for 10.3 USSR matches and even if you’ll get into a match you’ll just face terminators, even though you are playing the terminator…
Oh yes, i love guys who use that “sKiLl iSsUe” arguments :D
If you dont know what to say, say skill issue. It’s look like that.
Namer don’t have underperformed armor. That’s you skill issue when you try to hide it. Change my mind.
Yes, T-90M has more armor. On the paper. Paper will accept everything here, and that also is just a fact.
You dont understand the problem. It’s like “never ending story” when they add new “premium” or “top” tanks / planes. Currently BMPT armor is “bugged” (?) and this is not a “aiming issue” - if you shoot to the same place, 10 times, and all the time the result is different, that’s a aiming issue ? Why this aiming issue doesn’t occur on T-series tank ?
@StaszekJones
I’m here calling for BMPT to be moved up and your post just has nonsense in it.
So me taking responsibility for my flaws is something to be mocked?
Ironic that you’re the only one to have posts claiming “skill issue”.
Are you upset that we want BMPT brought up in BR?
Also no, the T-90M does not have more armor on paper. Statcards under-rate armor and that includes the T-90M. On paper the T-90M has equivalent armor or worse.
In practice, the T-90M has more armor due to a significantly stronger turret and more protected side ERA array.
