This is actually the first time I see a claim that diesel fuel tanks are modelled with less probability to be exploded. I thought they were the same in the game.
Wet storage of shells? Are russian tankers just huffing raw diesel fumes the entire time??
I mean technically 550mm pen shells already become pretty common around 11.7, with a whole bunch of them also appearing between 10.0 and 11.3.
Also as you can see even if you pen it, post pen damage sometimes not that great, compared when you shoot a mbt through the neck it most of the times kill everything in the turret.
10.0 - 11.0 has over 10? tanks with the pen.
M60 AMBT, Sabra Mk1, 120S, M1128 x2, ZTZ-96A x2, ZTZ-99 x2, M10 Booker, and an honorable mention to LOSAT.
@gfdsa_killer
Guns don’t fire missiles, sir.
And as for Spikes not fragging tanks… they very much are fragging tanks right now consistently with one missile from what I’ve witnessed. I’ve been seeing that killfeed in many matches recently.
Edit: This statement of me witnessing things is not my opinion nor my conclusion on SPIKE missiles. It’s purely here to share information so we can all have higher knowledge of what’s happening in our matches. -End edit.
Also front-aspect only shots are typically on large maps.
I haven’t been getting Sands of Sinai, Red Desert, Fields of Normandy, etc recently to see only front armor of BMPTs.
@H_ngma
Glad we agree BMPT uses Relikt.
B3A has APS causing its BR change.
AJAX has 3x the pen of with lower shatter angles.
Also don’t you all agree with me that BMPT should move up?
there are times where the fuel was more likely to explode than the ammo was
Weird APS doesnt seem to affect BR at all for the Challengers for example let alone justifies a .6 jump. neither does it for the T80UM2
And no missiles so whats your point
Nah you dont get to: “see guys we have actually totally the same opinion” after
saying that just because you got called out
Dont tell me you were comparing the autocannons… whats the point with that if the important armament of the bmpt its the ATGMs.
As a Namer player highly doubt it most of your kills with spikes were 1 shot, only against light armored tanks, but mbts like leopard?? doubt.
Ok so leopard 2a7 should go to 10.3 - 11.3 because its easy to kill from the sides, but difficult from the front?
1 Like
Ground launched FnF are unreliable as hell tho, they work quite well against lightly armored vehicles, but otherwise they work like 1/3 times, and the Jaguar for exemple got only 4 missiles onboard, making them a backup or a last resort at best
Source: me, who played quite a decent amount of matches with the EBRC
No need to tell me i spaded my Puma VJTF against my better judgement but FnF missiles are still a big boon compared to beam riding ones that expose you to enemy fire
So what about everyone else? There is more than 10 MBTs the BMPT can see.
And thats just at 10.X. Ive been playing CR1, with 400mm of pen of late (L23A1)
I cant even imagine what the hell a 9.3 is meant to do against a BMPT
3 Likes
huh https://www.reddit.com/r/TankPorn/comments/18rhd2y/first_recorded_bradley_tow2b_destroying_russian/
It’s T72B3 armour dude, not just B armour on the BMPT 72
I mean namers armour is hugely under performing as was proven years ago.
8.7 i think on the shturm they’re found.
however they are extremely fast as well for the BR.
BMP3 should be 9.7 easily but, and thats from having experience with the thing.
Also BMPT has gen 2 thermals on commander and gnner sights.
TBh this I gotta agree with 100 percent, they really gotta start taking a look at the BRs better when adding a lot of vehicles, they just kinda throw em in there RN and hope for the best. T58 being one such case in recent memory I have.
5 Likes
It’s not possible, everyone know russian tanks are indestructible, that video is a west propaganda !
xD
And ? You can be “gaijined” hitting russian armor. Today - non penetrated lower plate from Sabra, Gal Batash, Merkava Mk 2D.
Nothing happens to side shoot, also from the above tanks.
Armor eating shells from Merkava 2D …
BMPT has buffed armor, even T-90M is a lot easier to kill than BMPT.
And that was funny, this shit has 10.3 BR, get KD 5.0 +, 70-80 % of win rate, and now compare it to any other “tank destroyer” ( another topic, tank destroyer ? xDDDDDDDDD ) or light tank, you can add +10BR and you don’t find better or even same tank like BMPT
2 Likes
Is its armour a bug? or is it literally supposed to be this good.
Idler wheel, turret ring, lower front plate… Same weakspots people should be use to.
@H_ngma
So I don’t get to have the only opinion, and same exact opinion of BMPT moving up I’ve had on the vehicle for the last couple days? What a weird demand.
Black Night is a higher BR than Challenger 2…
T-80UM2 is a higher BR than T-80UD, it’s also an event vehicle that can easily avoid BR increases [see M60 AMBT].
@gfdsa_killer
People are disabling with cannons first, then after they determined they can’t finish off a tank with the autocannon will they use an ATGM.
Not sure why you’re making a weird take about 2A7.
Also the whataboutism meme is supposed to be “Alright Alvis, since you want BMPT moved up because it has good armor; does that mean you want Leopard 2A7 moved up as well because it has good armor?”
@An_Pigeon
The hull armor array of T-72B - 90M does not change.
And yeah, I’ve been saying Namer armor has been underperforming since dev server.
@StaszekJones
Me having an aiming issue is not me being “Gaijin’d”. I’m not a child that needs to blame others because I aimed poorly.
And T-90M objectively has more armor, that’s just a fact.
BMPT should move up, and you guys can keep arguing all you want, but I won’t change that stance.
I still reckon the BR was decided so that it would 100% be strong, just ahead of Christmas where people may have some disposable income to buy the Premium version.
Hopefully a BR change is early January, but im not holding my breath as they probably will milk the BMPT for a while
2 Likes
So whilst every MBT is aiming for tiny Weakspots (that can only be seen if the tank isnt hull down) the BMPT is just shredding eveything. The typical “jsut aim for the microscopic weakspot, its perfectly balanced” answer.
By that logic, can the CR2 be 10.3 and to kill it you just have to aim for the weakspots? Perfectly balanced
1 Like
Those weakspots are no where close to tiny. What’s tiny is the driver’s port people say to go for instead, while the turret ring is 8x larger…
yes you dont get to say that you totally want it to go up after stating that the most obviously undertiered ground vehicle since the release Puma is a “hard guess where it should be” and that you “can see where they were coming from with the BR they introduced this rather unique vehicle at”
its the same BR as the Challenger2E you know the one its foldered with
Same BR as the T80U
So no the T72B3A is not .6 higher because of APS but because of Relict