Yeah,give the Terminator the APFSDS belt and move it at 11.0 minimum. It’s straight up criminal to have Relikt+Spall liners and a crewless turret at 10.3 only because 10.3 is the Russian cashgrab lineup.
Moreover, destroying the ammo belts has a chance of cooking the ammo like having a blowout panel,when in the X-ray the tank does not have such a mechanic. So asjust this as well,the Terminator should genuinely blow up if you destroy the ammo 100% of the time
no more kaboom
Yeah i read that and it’s total bs, because right when this patch dropped my Freccia got smoked because a 30mm APDS grazed one of my launchers. So judging by Gaijin’s logic a 3.3kg TNTe Spike missile can cause a chain explosion and overpressure a light tank,meanwhile a 9.2kg TNTe (4.6kgs per missile,so 9.2 for the two missiles on one side if we considers the explosion between left and right separated) Ataka can’t overpressure a vehicle.
I guess USSR players complained a lot
both side complain a lot.
Thing is Freccia is kinda made of paper while BMPT is heavily armored.
Okay… you’re not going to like these results.
Cause the results show that players playing BMP-2M are about as skilled as players playing the other IFVs in the Soviet tech tree.
In-fact, here are the stand-outs: BMD-4s. They seem to attract the higher skilled players.
The premiums have the higher skilled players than the tech tree one.
It’s s heavily armoured,but not on the top of its turret. The shockwave of its Atakas exploding comes from above said part of the tank,meaning the vehicle should die from overpressure regardless
Yep, it’s always funny when people pretend this only happens when they add strong and iconic Russian vehicles
If it was an American vehicle it would’ve been 9.7 and not 10.3
It’s pretty classic for USA vehicles to be under br’d
120S
T58
Hstvl
A few other I could come up with are very to this day over preforming and vehicles, meanwhile Russia is the only issue.
lol, 5/10 troll.
I can vouch for the T58 because it should be 9.0 minimum and not 8.3,but the HSTV-L and the 120S overperforming?the HSTV-L has a combined 0.88 KD and the 120S has a combined 1.10 KD. For crude comparison, the T-80UD has a combined 1.16 KD and the 2S38 has a combined 1.15 KD.
Meaning that if the HSTV-L and the 120S are overperforming at their BR,the T-80UD and the 2S38 are more busted
How is that a troll?
T14 is 4.7
KV-1 is 4.7
T14 is way better
T29 is 7.0
Is 3 is 7.3
T29 is better
T58 is 8.3
T-10M is 8.3
T58 is far better.
These are just the heavy tanks. Stop having baseless claims
The hstvl is often played wrong, and that is a player problem.
The 120S can be somewhat situational, but it’s 5.0 sec Ace reload + top tier pen at 10.0? 10.3? With an abrams turret is quite good. It lacks good mobility and hulk armor though, and that still doesn’t make it bad, in Bull Dow it’s a monster.
2S38 should be 10.7 as I’ve been sayin forever now, and is listed as 10.7 in my br change list.
T58, thankfully someone agrees the T58 should’ve been 9.0, as I said when the dev server was up for when it was coming out.
Not only is it premium, it’s available for everyone, and has out shined even the Obj. 279 in pretty much every capacity besides mobility.
I don’t think the HSTV-L is overperforming in the game balance sense, but then again I also don’t think the 2S38 is super problematic so maybe that is just a me thing.
I personally like my light tanks.
Hstvl I have found to be quite deadly against all but the the Leo2a7s, but yet again most tanks struggle vs those.
It doesn’t matter,if the combined KD is 0.88 it means the majority of players play it like it is supposed to and you can achieve 4 kills every 5 deaths.
The 120S has a good round and amazing thermals for 10.3,but that’s it. The 5.0s reload is only if it’s an aced crew, otherwise it’s 5.3s expert and 5.8s maxed which is still good,but not crazy good. The turret armour is still weak to 3BM42s at some ranges (since the M1A1 doesn’t have either a DU insert or a Steel insert) and the biggest Abrams weakspot is even bigger in the 120S. I played that tank and although it is good, it’s far from being overestimated
It’s just pure Russian soft power projection now.
Such is the fragility of Russias ego.
I suppose “very good” is more appropriate for it. The 120S. I even forgot it had thermals.
Should still be 10.3 though.
And most people ace crews, I typically only expert them at best, and that’s even if I like the tank. Generally I don’t like a lot of them.
The average USA main plays like this though:
And I blame the vehicles and how the game makes them almost invincible in some regions making them believe they are invincible. Couple that with the one lifeing… even coupling Russia & USA together (as of late it seems USA has more players) still leads to constant loss, because after the first 3-5 minutes. The USA players have been wiped out and it’s the Russians attempting to beat back the swarms of leo spam from Germany and Sweden.
But yes how a vehicle is played does matter. Using a Khrizentema like an MBT isn’t a wise choice.
The two of you are crying in every thread about Russia bias, it’s actually impressive how much effort you put into this.
