The BMPTs are genuinely breaking the game at this point and I am straight up tired of it. What can Gaijin actually do to balance it? Because let’s be honest, changing it’s BR from 11.3 to 11.7 ain’t gonna do anything.
9 Likes
They will do the same thing they did with the 2S38, slowly changing it when sales are no longer as strong. Until then, we are going to have the next Russian vehicle to complain about. Gaijin likes its ouroboros.
both ahistorical so no
Connect the ammo rack to the belt in the turret so a shot in the turret one taps the vehicle
THEN, it’s fit for 11.7
There fixed it for you
2 Likes
Because all it takes to counter a BMPT is an 11.7 or 12.0 MBT…
Parroting the same word salad of misconceptions won’t magically make them become true. You literally have 0 clue about how statistics work which is apparent throughout this entire discussion.
Prime example of that :
That statement of yours there alone is enough to disqualify any of your grossly misinformed opinions. I already provided you education on that subject but since i enjoy educating clueless people let’s do some more of that :
-
You keep doubling down on fundamental misunderstanding of census vs. sampling while trying to claim that Thunderskill is the “uncurated” one. You keep arguing that surveying the “entire population” is always better which proves yet again my argument about your primitive understanding of the subject boiling down to ‘‘bigger number has to be better’’ …
-
For exemple you have 2.6 million data points, but 500K of them are from bots, 500k are from players who quit after one death, and 1.5M are from outdated patches, your “bigger number” is objectively providing a false reality.
-
In statistics, if you want to know the potential of a vehicle, you want a sample of people who actually know how to use it. Analyzing the “average” including people who don’t know the controls isn’t "better data"it’s diluted data.
The fact that you think a dataset containing bots, script-grinders, and inactive accounts from three years ago is ‘representative’ just because the number is big is the definition of being clueless. You’re arguing that a bucket of muddy water is better than a glass of clean water because 'there’s more of it … You aren’t advocating for statistical relevance , you’re advocating for a pile of garbage data and calling it a gold mine because it’s heavy.
Which ‘‘unknown population’’ you are referring to ?
In one breath you claim that Thunderskill players have to sign in , you even identify them as a homogenized group of ‘‘sweatlords’’ yet on your next breath you call them ‘‘uknown’’ population because it suits your flawed argument …
-
StatShark is the definition of “unknown population” not because it suits my argument but because it literally mixes everyone together , zombie accounts, script-grinders, one death quitters and people who barely know how to get out of the spawn, without any way to filter them out.
-
On Thunderskill you at least know that you are tracking sweatlords , so people who in vast majority know how to play .
Even on such basic level of logic you manage to contradict yourself … MAKE IT MAKE SENSE !
Hahahaha the nerve it takes to keep lying to yourself like that XD
we should buff the BMPT and place it at 9.3
I’d really love to fight those in my Type-16 and Type-74G.
Here again to say BMPT is still OP
Here’s you’re monthly Stat Shark Update:
Before BMPT was introduced last year this was November, in my opinion very close to 50% at BR 10ish and up (Sorry Germany)
December BMPT was introduced
January BMPT was known to be the META and extremely broken
February Still wrecking havoc but simmered down a bit
March we fast forward and it’s still taking names
Lets see what April holds for us folks and hope that Gajin fixes this tank quickly.
3 Likes
There you go citing team skill instead of providing proof.
All you have is conjecture, and you’ve not once provided a cross-analysis of vehicles to prove your position.
This post of mine is exclusively an attack on the content of your post, and not a comment on vehicles.
Provide proof, stop citing skill.
That’s a lot of text for saying you still don’t understand anything about statistics.
Since when would statsharks monthly stats include inactive accounts? You don’t even know what you’re talking about you’re just yapping away about things you don’t understand and you’re still going off about bigger number better when I specifically explained to you why it’s better.
Oh no you again, your comments are as useful as Anne Franks drumkit.
1 Like
I agree, if you’re inactive in a month, there’s no statistics for sharkstat or thunderskill to pull and doesn’t affect the data. That’s why I stick to monthly vs the overall.
1 Like
BMPTs are still OP
I got a 10.7 Leopard Lineup. If there are more than 2 BMPTs in game, they screw the whole match, even being at 11.7 now. It has to go to 12
So … what about your Challenger 2 TES win rate?
Irrelevant to the capabilities of the vehicle.
The team that wins is usually determined prior to you even spawning, cause it’s 32 variables of skill.
The primary exception was when I yelled at my team at 3.7 to stop spawning aircraft otherwise we’d lose, which they did and we ended up winning. Good French match on Flanders.
KDR disparity in a player’s service record can showcase some of vehicle differences, but isn’t as accurate as a cross analysis.
No, Good vehicle can win alone
This is my BMPT
And my play BMPT all at 13.0 BR
4 Likes
Team skill is also dependent on the…. Team. And I can tell from your placement in matches and K/D you provide zero value your team.
5 Likes
Discussing anything with him is a one way street. He can’t have his ego hurt taking a losing argument.
7 Likes
He seems that it doesn’t feel the “loss” in the game is bad
But he must win the argument
Can’t feel a loss in a game if you only hid to farm kills. It’s the same as the kid who plays hide and seek and when you find him instead of losing he says he wasn’t playing 💀