Sorry, i’m not going to burn money on your cope. Until you get a T-XX yourself your opinions are null and void.
you shouldn’t because my K/D is not for impress anyone especially you.
because of what? you have higher K/D in it?
1 Like
If this is insensitive, sorry, but please speak proper english. I cannot understand what you are saying.
Also have not much idea of what you are saying here. Why the Challengers/Arietes are better? More versatile. Better reloads, reverse gears, depression, gun handling, etc.
That’s what I thought
CR2 has a good reload for four rounds only. Standard gun depression of -10deg. Gun handling…? Stabilized like every other MBT.
Better reload than the T-XX’s.
-10 is way better than -5.
Gun handling is way better than T-XX until BVM/B3. Faster horizontal and 5x the vertical traverse.
Last I checked -37 is more than -11 or -4.
Trying to ignore armor and survivability hah? because that what both don’t have you got OHK easier than any T-series tank for Challenger case its entire hull for Ariete its entire tank
and what the hell we even talking about until now? you thought i compared to T-80U and T-90A for entire these times?
Most of what you point out is contextual. And also hardly any of these are relevant when you consider the CR2 is an obese, slow tank that can barely turn on the spot unlike T series racecars with tiny silhouettes and better armour.
Reload is only better for for rounds which gets blown through almost instantly. T-Series have autoloaders that are consistent.
For the first 4 rounds and only assuming your loader hasnt been killed, which is 99.99% chance to happen if you survive a hit. In the T-Series, once repaired, your reload never decreases.
I once had a 15 second reload for more than half a match ,because I couldnt replenish my first stage ammo (which should be 28 rounds not 4) and my loader was dead.
Your mistake was getting hit. Don’t complain about getting hit.
Ariete must be a 17.0 tank in disguise. People just haven’t figured out not to get hit yet /s
Wow. what a terrible argument. Using that argument, you could justify any vehicle to be at max BR.
T-72 TURMS to 11.7 pleaase, those things are annoying to deal with at 10,0
1 Like
I have played the Challies extensively, their armor, while quite poor, is okay around the turret. The survivability is quite good. I often find myself messing up, getting shot, and living, only losing Driver or Driver/Loader.
12.0 is not the only BR in the game. 11.0 until 12.0 is the top BR bracket. 2E is still > 90M and BVM
2BN is ~= to 90M and worse than BVM.
You should never expect to survive a hit at top tier? Its a useful piece of advice, go search up the survivability onion. Maybe this is why the players in this game suck so bad.
My mistake, “okay around the turret”
The strongest point can still be penned by DM53 and Obj292 APFSDS. UFP can be penned by almost everything.
So the CR2 is:
- The Largest tank at top tier
- The slowest tank at top tier
- Has the second weakest shell (with some of the worst, if not worst, post pen damage, its rare for me to get a one shot. usually it takes 2 rounds to something ammo rack to kill them)
- worst sustained fire rate at top tier
- the second worst survivaiblity of any tank at top tier
but its “fine” because “dont get hit”
There is no justification for the CR2 to be:
A) Artificially nerf to the degree it is
or
B) to be at the same BR as superior tanks like the T-80BVM, Leopard 2 or M1A2.
2E is fine where it is. I do not mind everything else going down. I never disagreed.