Binocular View on Namer Tsrikhon

Usually when i peak with binoculars i stay somewhat obscured by the hill or whatever i am peaking bejond. but it doesnt work on the namer tsrikhon. No matter where i am peaking the enemy can see my whole turret even from 1.5km he simply shots my ammo rack depsite tha fact its below the viewpoint. Every single time i try to recon with binocs the enemy sees me instant and shoot my turret which isnt right IMO. If you compare the screenshots please explain me how it is possible i get my ammo rack shot 9 out of 10 times.



as you can see the viewpoint of each is different like it should but it doesnt have an effect on my visibility. Its fake. For the enemy its like i am looking through my gunners view so he can clearly see my whole turret which he shouldnt. thats why there is a binoc view in the first place and i only have this issue with the Namer.

L, too bad your op vehicle has that small issue

Op vehicle? explain why it is OP? And it isnt a small issue, if you say so u absolutly have no clue.

sure bud

I see ,@Zahltag, that your in this game for years. Just becouse sombody is complaying about their tank, doesnt mean to be rude. An Adult would tried to solve the problem. Maybe it time to get out of that chair and become a real man?

1 Like

try being a real man with gaijin, as if they give a shit. Is the vehicle russian? No.

May as well not bother they won’t fix anything

Then go bug report it, or talk to a tank expert.

They do give a shit in thier game, but not in the place what we want. I agree that they dont listen to us, but in this case, you straight up said to that player: L. Ur a Noob. Bad Player. He didnt ask you for your rating, he was asking the community for help & explination.
I can see now why you have a chat ban.

1 Like

your right. The binocular is to low. It should be higer, cos the commander can peak higher. And the commander sight is fixed, the tank is just low.

1 Like

Oh, you must indeed be new here.

You think they care if you report a bug.

You sweet summer child.

And yes bc the namer is a hull down monster, far superior to basically all other such vehicles (except the russian ones ofc) at and around its br

Its the matter how you define ,new" .If you meant i just started some month ago, then your wrong. If you understand ,new" being here longer then a year, then yes. I am here for 3 and a half year. I understand tank as if it was me.

I know they dont care so much about bug reports, but its the way you discribe them. People just write: Oh this tank hasnt have it most powerful shell in IRL, Teh crew told me this, then of course nobady would want to accept the report. You need to put detaild writing and evidence.

Yes, I am beutiful.

yeah, thats why its binocular is short.

1 Like

Aw cute. You think me and others havent done that.

The mods for bug reports are often egomaniac russophiles.

The block 2 aps doesn’t work? The bright mod said “yea it does” and closed the topic.

I’m sorry, but the devs actually fix and adjust a huge number of vehicles every update. Yes, some issues have taken years to get resolved and some are still waiting!! But Just in this patch alone there are dozens of changes across multiple nations. Armor corrections, flight model updates, new weapons, bug fixes, and damage model improvements.

For example: Leclercs got new modules, the T-72 hull armor geometry was corrected, the Starstreak missile received a new flight model, the AMX-30 had engine and gun handling changes, Japanese Chi-Ha engines were updated, British vehicles like the Stormer and Scimitar were adjusted, and Swedish vehicles like the Strv 103, Strv 104 & Strv 105 and JAS39 received fixes and additions.

That’s only a small portion of the list. Sure, some issues take a long time to fix and some are still waiting, but saying they “don’t fix anything unless it’s Russian” just isn’t true when you actually look at the patch notes.

Update 2.53.0.103 Gave the ELC 901 Arty lol

bild

1 Like

Yeah well, I agree. But, if this coninue to go on, the game will die out. And probably, a bozo wrote the report and it was so badly written, that the mod just said no. And its how the Developers sees the mecanic, and the players.
Maybe contact an IRL tank expert and show them the footage and ask if its correct.

Außerdem, Klassik Deutsche, Lol, fast wie ein Österreicher, Lol

image

2 Likes

Namer is nowhere from being OP at all, just take a look the BMPTs.

Well i didnt call it a bug and this wasnt ment to be a bug report i just pointet it out with a question mark so to speak and wanted to hear its just me noticing this or i am wrong because its for some reason other than its a hulldown monster and thats why the binoculars set in a hight where its useless compared to other tank for “balancing” (which i actually thought about). If so its unfair, if its a bug i might call this a bug report lol.

As much as i agree they “care” there is no sense in it taking over a year to fix the APS systems and over 7 years for a missile bug fix.