BI-1 Is Pay-to-Win and needs to be dealt with

We’re talking about BI, not about Vampire, you absolute dingus.

And everything maneuvers, it’s just a matter of how. I routinely go way below 700 in F86 and actually for a good effect. Furballs develop just fine at 8.3.
Going below 700 vs BI = death sentence and 7.7 planes are usually WAY slower than F86. BTW I doubt F86 can hope to kill BI outside of some lucky bullet landing, as BI has the best dodges in the business.

Dude, it doesn’t just beat me. It beats anyone flying 7.3 and lower planes every single time. It’s either BI wins or a stalemate. In no realistic scenario BI loses, unless some super lucky spray happens. GL with that.

I don’t care about modern jets, so make a separate topic to cry about some Kaffir Canuck.

1 Like

Ok, so your fix is just to let BI absolutely ROFLstomp props till everyone moves to 5.3 and lower just to avoid the experience, because you’re gonna cry and poo in your diaper if you can’t have your BI special easy mode?

No, I was referring to the fact that Gaijin makes terrible decisions for balance. They don’t care about balance, they care about money. The BI gives them money, therefore they won’t do anything to hurt it. The BI is also a part of the “Big Three” and my goodness, they will never nerf the Big Three. When was the last time those three got a nerf? Turret basket isn’t a nerf

1 Like

You can stop reporting my messages because you don’t like me. It is honestly sad.

What was I doing? How about you stop with these delusions. I haven’t reported your posts.
I’ve been in this forum for quite some time (12 years) you’re not even close to anything I’d think about reporting.

Not sure what was unclear.

Despite it is off-topic: If you do some research you find out that other 6.7 jets (i exclude Sweden) are actually older and basically just USSR prop airframes with a German engine. The FB 5 is still a 1948 aircraft; it doesn’t matter when the maiden flight of a way less powerful prototype happened.

Based on your logic a Bf 109 K-4 is a 1935 aircraft - same as the F 24 Spitfire just because their prototypes had their maiden flights in 1935.

So you are still comparing apples with oranges.

There is no German bias regarding early jets. As you are a UK fan: Convince gaijin that they implement the Meteor F 1 at 6.7 (with a top speed ~ 660 kmph) and you have a jet at a lower BR.

This is 100% correct.

From my pov this is a far stretch. Yes, they get a cut of market place transactions, but otherwise it looks more like a topic of USSR bias.

This might be true for US & USSR aircraft - but for sure not for German aircraft. Currently they were nerfed by the MG 151 “adjustment” last summer, various FM nerfs of props and most recently by the fuel nerf of the rocket Me 163.

Whilst US jets of the Korean war era sit at the same BR as a 1944 production Me 262. So too low BRs nerfs just via the MM…

I kindly ask you to stay on topic. Thx 4 understanding.

1 Like

That was a level of “Im making shit up” that I could never anticipate of. “spitfire turn in 8 seconds” is crazy.

Just to be clear, I was talking about pure jets, not established planes that got stuffed with a German engine after they capitulated. But enough of that topic.

Yeah, that will go over well. Everyone knows Gaijin hates Britain. They are more likely to put the Meteor at 16.7 before they ever put it down to 6.7, that’s just the honest truth of it all.

I really don’t believe in Russian bias, then again, I’ve also fought against plenty of Russian mains and have actually used Russian equipment to know and understand that Russian stuff is not that good, it’s more of an issue of noobs being sad their “invincible” Leopards and Abrams cannot destroy a T-80 just by looking at them. Same with jets, Russia is just average, but American mains think they can dogfight, and German mains just believe that the Luftwaffe was somehow indestructible and they shouldn’t have lost the war.

Ah yes, I forgot Germany got a nerf in the air last summer. Not like they needed it, but hey, most German mains accepted their air sucked, but as long as Gaijin doesn’t destroy their tanks, they’re OK.

As I said, now that I know a bit more about the BI beyond, “it’s too good, please nerf” I can see why it should go up to 7.0, I still believe 7.7 is too extreme for a prop, but that’s why I’m not in charge of balancing. I like clear boundaries, not randomly throwing things at random BRs.

Holy bait

Guess you could call it the master?

1 Like

the BI is the ONLY plane i cant deal with in any way at all when I fly a mk24 spitfire, meteor or hell even something like a hunter isn’t gonna be able to take it on.

It not being at 8.7 as its a infinitely better Komet is insanity.

Russia already has OP stuff at that BR in the SU9 and SU11 they don’t need the hypersonic stalinium rocket there too

3 Likes

I’ve found it to be very untouchable when playing the Mig-9 Late, and that’s a very well performing plane for the BR that flies better than the Su-11 in some ways. So a 6.7 is impossible to deal with in a good 7.3 plane.

Atleast dealing with Me-163s aren’t hard because they’re higher in BR (and overtiered), but they also need to use higher throttle settings to get the most out of their plane, while the BI just doesn’t.

4 Likes

I just had the most immaculate fight with a BI-1. Rate out of 10:
Replay link
At this rate, the BI-1 will be a 5.0 plane.

Managed to find a picture of the pilot:

Spoiler

image

Yeah, dude is a real WT legend. and yeah a lot of BI users are not much smarter than slightly below average chair.