Oh by all means don’t take the out I offered you, double down instead lmfao rn btw
Yeah I want you to go around and tell people mk108s are better than shvaks and see how they respond. I have 70% winrate and 3 kills to every death in yak3 and I don’t have friends to squad with to inflate my results.
Mk - 108 136g HE mass per round
Shvak - 6.7g HE mass per round.
Please continue to tell me it’s not a better gun.
Continue to expose yourself
lmao you just continue to expose your lack of game knowledge
usually when I make I fool of myself I come to my senses and stop posting, but to each their own
Opinion, opinion, opinion with you.
If you have nothing to say about the topic, I suggest you stop, because you’re derailing, and cannot accept facts.
Given you @coffee_can-psn and @iegaatdao continue to respond one after the other and like each others posts one after the other in a suspicious way, almost like it’s an alt of yours.
I proudly expose myself as a shvak superiority defender
Now YOU prove yourself as a mk-108 superiority defender
I’m dying laughing rn
Shvaks btw
Might not transfer to jets but the bi fights props as well as jets.
I feel engagement distances peak a little a round superprops and the come down , so early jets pull the trigger a little later since they’ll be catching to their ww2 era rounds in some cases.
I would like to see the P-51H to climb like this https://youtu.be/rP2IPyaJ7fM, right after hitting 5000m you can go down to 20% and reach 700 easy while still climbing and having almost 20 mins of fuel left, good luck trying to get the advantage in anything
i dont want to sound rude but
youre the one denying facts
it doesnt matter what the HE mass is
its not only somewhat its prob about 300m/s difference (i cant tell for sure rn tho cuz im taking a few weeks of a brake on WT)
maybe not only play russia (Rank 3-5 ARB) and tell me your expirience with flying stuff like 109s and 190s or stuff like that
im sorry to tell you but thats how guns work
yea maybe think more
ill help you read what the guy said
did you spot the word OTHER in that sentence?
you can cruise at +600km/h at 10% throttle too
where does that fuel efficiency come from?
BI is mostly used on SQB’s and it’s a monster there. Also even for ARB with reduced throttle BI can still outmaneuver EVERYTHING it can face, still it’s not a dogfighter, you go in the space and boom/zoom enemies.
At 55% throttle:
You burn ~110 kg/min for ~620 kgf thrust.
You burn a third of the amount of fuel for 2/3 thrust still.
Move BI from 6.7 to 7.7 or something - #3 by RunaDacino
6.7 is absolute joke for BI, it’s like Maus at 6.7… or IS-6 at 6.0.
The more i read. The more i want
There is literally NO SINGLE reason to let it be 6.7… even at 7.3 BI would be still VERY OP.
If BI is 6.7 then I want ME-163B-0 / Ki-200 at 7.0. not 8.3…
When Me-163B-0 / ki-200 are 8.3 then BI should be 8.0 then.
0.3 BR diff is fair. not 1.6BR…
From WTRTI, really usefull for WT, you can download it for free on GitHub, is 100% legal so dont worry
the problem is that the BI needs some aim and more than two working neurons
most aircraft that fall into this category are very op due to how players fuck up playing them all the time and just die to the first enemy they see
Comparing their performance is most logic.
BI is much faster but less fuel, KI-200 / ME 163 are much slower but has more fuel - Speed/Sustain trade-off
BI has less ammo, bc smaller, lighter and faster, Me-163B-0/Ki-200 are bigger, slower and has more ammo. that’s why 0.3 BR higher is fair, bc ammo is more crucial is this case.
Player’s skill factor CANNOT be a base of balance, because even weak vehicles can be deadly in right hands…
Some ppl can kill Abrams with BT7, but it doesn’t mean that BT7 should be 8.0 right?
Wrong.
So can anyone with Shvaks, the difference is, Shvaks can actually hit their target at few hundred meters.
Wrong.
Shvak on Yak-3e alone is more armanent tham Bf 109 K4 has at 5.7
MG is just a cherry on top. Yak3e has no business being anywhere else but 4.7
Same applies to normal Yak-3. The fact 1 has slightly less armanent doesn’t matter, as both can dismantle a Bf 109 by hitting 1 20mm shell to the wing.
True, at 7.3 it would still deny the enemy any chance of dogfighting and it would still outclimb, outturn and out-energy everything
Yeah, essentialy BI can run 40% (which is enough power to outperform anyone else AND outturn them) for like 10m straight. At 20% it has fuel for more than the match lasts.
The trick to have super good performance at 40%?
Use up at least 40% of fuel.
People act like this plane needs full power to turn well.
Once it drops 40-50% of fuel, it needs way more to turn crazy-good, and at 1m of fuel left, it can still happily last till the match ends.
you dont even need the 20 mm you can onetap most enemys with only one of the two 50cals on the yak3
so there is no point for the yak3(e) [basically a yak3 at 4.0 which performs slightly better (you wont notice it) and has one less OP gun (you also wont notice this) ] to be this low
I mean, I agree. 4.7 is a more reasonable spot. It’s not like Bf 109 G6 has good chances against it anyway, lol.