You are a better 1v1 player than I.
You are also going to be a better player than most, which Statshark alleges I am as well.
You have a good boom and zoom rocket, and put it in your hands, and you trust it, I fully expect you to just not die.
Like if you played F-104S when it was 10.7 I would’ve expected you to just never get hit by anything.
@Carlosdb
Prove the BI players have that KDR in the P51H.
You can’t compare different players, it has to be the same player.
@Loofah
People are not beneath you or provoking you just because we’re saying the BI is powerful.
No is is trying to get any of us banned, literally no one here.
i dont need to eat uranium to know its bad, i listen to data and experts and know it is a bad idea.
I see that it is the only viable competitive plane at its br in sqb, that it has massive stats compared to anything ingame, and that it cost 300gjn because it is p2w.
This was my first post, criticizing the endurance of the BI in air RB.
This is from the perspective of exclusively facing them, many didn’t die until they were forced into a multi-player engagement.
This was never a dismissal of it being strong, as I’ve stated previously on many platforms that it’s strong.
The BI is strong, which @Leinadmix9_ツ and others will agree with me on.
Now, whether it’s OP in the context of a team based match… that’s the discussion.
From my study, from how I understand team play, endurance matters a lot.
Ease of play also matters.
A BI as a platform will do fine at 6.7 alongside P51H and Spitfire.
However, at 7.3 there are jets that are better: MB326K, F2H, and Sea Meteor are notably better aircraft for air RB.
7.0 might have a few things as well, but I haven’t checked.
it is a fair argument, you can only blame yourself if you are taking it as a personal attack. Or simply putting “feelings” in the way to avoid the facts
50% and higher throttle.*
I never mentioned 100% throttle, I responded to posts that talked about it, but I didn’t mention it.
I only ever addressed the entire upper half of throttle.
