Reasonable POV doesn’t equal to the plane being bad/trash.
Reasonable POV would be to say the plane isn’t as easy to fly to effectively as other single engine fighters at the BR range.
im aware of that
but in fw190 your enemy has to mess up in one way or another for you to get the kill
therefore its not a good plane
how you or anyone else does in something does not rlly accurately depict how good/bad it is
at all
and no i dont have an issue in fw190s
i actually am playing them rn and im having as much fun as you can have with this game (yea its not much)
1 Like
This applies to all planes.
Still, plane is good, pilot might not be.
Actually it does, success in a plane isn’t solely dependant on the pilot. No matter what Tom Cruise says.
Sorry to hear that you can’t have much fun in WT. I find it quite enjoyable for the most part. I do get overall game fatigue from time to time, but that’s to be expected after 11 years of it.
Anyways. Pointless to argue as we have different viewpoints on the matter. Fly safe!
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Ooof, the good old “1v1 me bro” argument.
Irrelevant as a 1v1 under preset conditions doesn’t reflect match conditions in the slightest.
you’re claiming skill issue, you choose your 190 and I’ll choose any plane with the same br, you will lose. 190s are objectively terrible and need an entire flight model rework
I dunno man, took the 190 A-4 out again after a while. Seems to be doing fine
And here are the 2 matches prior to that one:
Spoiler
could not care less about a lucky game, hope in a custom or stop posting, 190s are utterly outclassed.
be ready to be dominated by a yak or la5 or whatever
2 Likes
Well damn, i must be the luckiest player alive.
Spoiler
hope in a custom if you’re so lucky, stop running from it lil bro
Well accept the friend request i sent you 3 hours ago so i know when you’re online
Edit: An hour later…
Perhaps tomorrow.
Im going to sleep
Japan main here; stay the heck away from the IJAAF and IJNAS aircraft. Since you won’t have a clue how to use them cause they are not all turn fighters.
Also, in terms of the 109s, quit turn fighting; same goes to 190’s.
These are low- to medium-altitude energy fighters to medium- to high-altitude interceptors. This is how they operate in-game: when you have the energy advantage, you can turnfight, assuming you have enough to spend. How do you tell? Your IAS.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
I flew the Fw 190A-8, and I have to admit that the only way I could escape enemies was to dive and pull away using speed until they decided to turn back. Whenever I tried to use barrel rolls to escape and counter-attack an enemy on my tail, I only prolonged the inevitable; as soon as they overshot me, they would climb, and if I tried to follow, the Fw would become sluggish—taking so long to point the nose upward that the enemy had plenty of time to regain speed and maneuverability while I was still completing the vertical turn.
What really surprised me about the A-8 is that it is faster than a Yak-3 at low altitude in level flight.
That is one of the problems I tend to see with the Fws.
https://youtube.com/shorts/zP9VH8X0gq0?is=F94K1mWpMr7wIZAL
Wounder why it was conserdered successful design irl, while ingame most FW airframes are …well difficult + problematic.
wow
proof that germany US teams are trash
1 Like
cuz what the instructor makes the FM is not even close to how it should be
(try fw190s in sim they are pretty fun to fly there)
There should be a slider on how much the instructor does the hand holding.
idk
it does no hand holding at all with most german planes tbh from my exp in sim and arb
Instructor is turned off in sim, isn’t it?
1 Like