Bell-Boeing MV-22B: Osprey's Got Teeth

The Bell-Boeing V-22 Osprey is a joint service multirole combat aircraft that utilises tiltrotor technology to achieve the combined vertical performance of a helicopter and the speed and range of a fixed wing aircraft. Used by the United States Marine Corps, United States Air Force, United States Navy, and the Japan Ground Self-Defence Force for various operations involving cargo and troop transport, but most excitingly, combat weapons testing.

History

The idea for the V-22 came about after the failure of Operation Eagle Claw in 1980 where it was realised that the US needed a new type of aircraft was capable of not only taking off and landing vertically but also to carry combat troops and be fast. So in 1981 the DoD began the JVX aircraft program under the leadership of the US Army in cooperation with the USMC and US Navy.

The USMC wanted an aircraft that could replace their aging CH-46 Sea Knight’s which due to some of it’s flaws was one of the leading factors in the failure of Operation Eagle Claw. A request for preliminary design prototypes was issued in the end of 1982 which Aérospatiale, Bell Helicopter, Beoing Vertol, Grumman, Lockheed and Westland taking interest, they were each asked to partner up in order to design the aircraft they wanted. In 1983 Bell-Boeing submitted a prototype named the XV-15, as this was the only submission the JVX program received, the contract was awarded to them in the spring of 1983. The XV-15 would later go on to become the V-22 Osprey and it’s versions.

The JVX designated the XV-15 the V-22 Osprey at the start of 1985 with the first 6 prototypes being produced by March of that year. In 1988 the V-22 was publicly announced alongside the US Army withdrawing from the JVX program, leaving the USMC and US Navy to continue development. The first of the 6 prototypes successfully flew in Autumn of 1989. However the 4th and 5th prototypes crashed during testing from October 1992 and April 1993. The USMC MV-22 entered service in February 2007 just after the US Navy’s CV-22 and later the CMV-22.

The MV-22 was deployed to Afghanistan in November 2009 with VMM-261 where it’s first combat mission took place on the 4th of December 2009, Operation Cobra’s Anger where the MV-22’s was involved in deploying 300 Marines from the 3rd Battalion, 4th Marines, and the Marine Recon Unit in conjunction with Sikhorsky CH-53E Super Stallions in the Helmand Province against Taliban and Al-Qaeda forces.

The MV-22 also is used for various non-combat/rescue missions. In January 2010, MV-22’s were sent to Haiti as part of Operation Unified Response relief efforts after magnitude 7 earthquake. In March 2011, 2 MV-22’s were sent from the USS Kearsarge, a Wasp-class amphibious assault ship to help rescue a downed F-15E crew member during Operation Odyssey Dawn in Libya. On the 2nd of May 2011, after Operation Neptune’s Spear an MV-22 was used to transport the body of Osama bin Laden (founder of the Al-Qaeda terrorist group responsible for many terror attacks included most infamously the events of 9/11) to the aircraft carrier Carl Vinson in the Arabian Sea where Bin Laden was then buried at sea.

Since then the MV-22 has been used on various missions. In 2013, the first of 12 MV-22’s were placed within the HMX-1 Presidential Airlift Squadron in which it has been used for the transportation of the President of the United States, the First Lady, and other members of the US Government.

In 2012, the Japanese Defence Minister Satoshi Morimoto ordered an investigation into the costs of V-22’s for the use in the Japan Self-Defence Forces. In 2014 the Japanese Military of Defence decided to procure 17 V-22’s where the first of which took flight in 2017. However after a fatal crash of an CV-22 off Yakushima in November 2023 Japan suspended flights of their MV-22’s, they later resumed their flights in March 2024. In 2025 Japan’s MV-22’s are planned to be based from Saga Airport in Kyushu where they will be deployed alongside AH-64DJP’s and UH-60’s.

Specifications
  • Weight
    Empty - 15,030kg
    Vertical Takeoff Max - 25,909kg
    Short Takeoff Max - 27,443kg

  • Engine
    2 Rolls-Royce AE-1107C Engine with a combined total of around 12,300 horsepower

  • Performance
    Cruise Speed - 448-473kph
    Max Speed - 509kph
    Service Ceiling - 7,254m
    Rate of Climb - 11.8-20.3m/s

  • Armament
    60 x Split Countermeasures (Chaff and Flares)
    1 x 7.62 M240 or 1 x .50 M2 Browning on the rear ramp
    1 x 7.62 GAU-17 turret (IDWS Interim Defensive Weapon System) mounted to the belly which can be retracted for takeoff and landings.
    [Tested] 2 x Hydra rocket pods or APKWS pods
    [Tested] 2 x AGM-176 Griffin Air to Ground guided missiles

  • Avionics (relevant to War Thunder)
    AN/AAR-47 Missile Approach Warning System
    AN/AYK-14 Mission Computer
    APQ-186 Multifunction Radar
    AN/AAQ-24 Directional Infrared Counter Measure
    L-3 Wescam MX-15 sensor/laser designator
    Helmet Mounted Sights / HMD

Pictures


V-22 in forward flight


image
MV-22 test firing Hydra/APKWS rockets


MV-22 with IDWS deployed


View of the IDWS firing from inside of the MV-22


Gunner using an Xbox-like controller to use the IDWS

image
Gunner firing the rear ramp mounted .50 M2 Browning


MV-22 Firing Chaff and Flares

image
Cockpit of the MV-22

image
View of an Osprey being refuelled from within the cockpit

image
MV-22 being refuelled mid-air by KC-130J

Videos

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KYJML71QQbo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_G65vVQlgi4

Overall I think that the MV-22 would be a very unique and interesting aircraft to add the the US helicopter tech tree with also the possibility of being added to Japan to help bolster their helicopter tree.

Should the MV-22 be added to War Thunder
  • Yes
  • No
0 voters
How should the MV-22 be added?
  • Tech Tree Vehicle
  • Event Vehicle
  • Squadron Vehicle
  • Premium Vehicle
  • I Said No
0 voters
What BR should the MV-22 be?
  • 9.7 or lower
  • 10.0
  • 10.3
  • 10.7
  • 11.0
  • 11.3 or higher
  • I Said No
0 voters
Should it be added to Japan too?
  • Yes
  • No
0 voters
Sources

The Military Wants a Forward-Firing Gun for the Osprey
USMC V-22 Osprey’s Get Teeth.
The V-22 Osprey Finally Gets The Missiles And Rockets It Needs
The V-22 Osprey’s New Belly Gun Rotates 360 Degrees To Fire 3,000 Rounds a Minute
Bell Boeing Demonstrates Forward-firing Capability for V-22 Osprey
V-22 Osprey Fact Sheet
Bell Boeing V-22 Osprey
V-22 Osprey: Unlike any aircraft in the world
Navy Programs MV-22 Osprey
Boeing V-22 Osprey
V-22 Osprey
The tiltrotor revolution: MV-22B Osprey

7 Likes

+1 Absolutely yes as an addition, it may have limited weapons but certainly has a place ingame.

Hopefully it gets added with the normal hud flight model of a VTOL aircraft (in terms of hud) rather than helicopter as it would fit the vehicle better. And potentially do the flight model like the Wyvern or A2D where throttle controls the constant speed props speed with it automatically adjusting the prop angle (instead of us controlling collective).

But this would certainly be a very unique addition to both US and Japanese tech trees.

3 Likes

+1
make it so that helis that can carry soldiers IRL can cap points faster or if infantry gets added allow them to spawn on helis

2 Likes

Hopefully we get this soon ingame.

+1, however Japan should NOT get a copy paste Osprey.

Why shouldn’t Japan get it? They already have 13 and are apparently ordering another 3?

1 Like

Copy paste is bad. Besides, America doesn’t deserve for the only vehicle, unique to America, to have been added in months be extraordinarily garbage (the F-117).

I may just be biased against copy paste in saying this, but I think the nations in WT should be unique (why even have nations if they all have the same vehicles?)

1 Like

Because players want to use their countries vehicles, and even in WW2 vehicles were sold as exports to other countries so there will always be duplication and there always has been. Ignoring that precident is abit odd.

And the F-117 works very well. However the reward in sl and rp does not work effectively for it’s small payload.

This would be insane +1!!!

1 Like

Copy paste is bad. Why even have separate nations if they all have the same vehicles?

The F-117 is overtiered and pretty broken. The fact that it’s higher than the A-4E whilst being objectively worse is wild.

It’s 8.7 in air rb how is that overtiered? And considering vehicles of it’s era can’t radar slave missiles to you from a long distance away is quite useful. Theres always the threat of IR missiles.

And most of us would disagree. Because what does a nation do when it runs out of homebuilt vehicles, and other nations still kept making more advanced ones? Do you want germany to stop after the Me-262 and Horten 229 ingame?

Giving the V-22 to Japan (if applicable) would be a nice addition to the JASDF tree for v/stol vehicles.

2 Likes

It’s 10.0 in GRB (the mode it matters in)

It would be better that Japan doesn’t get copy paste, especially American copy paste.

1 Like

someone who doesnt play japan wants things to not come to japan.
japan operates mv-22’s and should get them in their tech tree too.

3 Likes

Copy paste is bad, Japan shouldn’t get special treatment.

countries that operate specific vehicles are in general allowed to get them
if you dont like it then you can continue crying about it but this is how war thunder operates and you cant change it

1 Like

but do they have rocket pods and the turrets? they probably wont add them to japan since afaik they never put the rockets on them and i dont think they even got the turrets

A vehicle exported to Japan and operated by Japan shouldn’t go to the Japanese tech tree? Can’t really complain about most American vehicles not being exclusive to the US when they are commonly exported to most of the world??

1 Like

Except they likely don’t have any armament (especially the turret), so yeah, they probably shouldn’t get it.

US is also the only user of the AGM-176, and even they only tested it aboard the MV-22, so Japan definitely shouldn’t get that.

1 Like

We get it, you don’t like sharing your American vehicles, but fortunately the United States likes to share it’s equipment.
just wait until 5th generation fighters come along and everyone gets the F-35.

Also +1! For the Osprey for the U.S. and Japan.
Also would it be an issue if the U.S. one got the presidential skin, I love the way it looks. Probably would be some issues there though.