you are desсribing the m3 bradley bar the 1200mm pen
wt… have the m3 bradley?
sure looks like one to me
has the thermals, stabilized gun, apds and a recon drone
430 mm pen missile and have crew in turret + its slow and no spall liner
Still smashes 7.3 tanks when it sees em.
1 Like
…its also 8.3
no spall liners in front
I really like how the PUMAs barrel in supporting structure with large cooling ribs overheats and start loosing accuracy after a few rounds.
Meanwhile Gaijins 2A42 with simple barrel 50% higher RPM can shoot indefinitely with minor accuracy loss.
True marvel od soviet engineering.
https://www.military.com/video/bmp-2-live-fire-close
No dispersion at all …
6 Likes
Weakest russian Laser vs Strongest NATO 30mm
(We’ll never see good dispersion on a nato autocannon)
Like what I mentioned. You are a troll or just have issues with reading comprehension.
People like you, Alvis Visla and other “I don’t know what are you talking about, the game is balanced” people can go play 10.3 USSR forever in a separate server with all the china mains, I’ll vote for that.
1 Like
You can’t call people trolls just because they disagree with your take. If it’s so obvious just tell us which vehicles are problematic.
1 Like
the ones I mentioned multiple times. I said why I think you are a troll and it’s definitely not bcs you disagree with me.
1 Like
Ok? Can you direct me to where you said it? I am not antagonizing you so I don’t know why you feel the need to attack me.
1 Like
Want to add. 2S38 can switch between shells if the shell was already loaded in the mechanism in certain order, but it takes AT least 4 shots before you go from the mechanical “hand” to the shell in the belt, as it shows in the model.
Edit: not to mention the time for the autoloader to spin and take a different shell in the mechanism like in T-72.
BTR-82 is faster, has safe angles and tows are shit.
The beaglepanzer at 9.3 ist criminal but fine if for you its not equal to 2s38 fine make it 10.0
1 Like
Never said BegleitPanzer was not criminal or bad. It’s 9.7 right now and I have no data about it’s decency. I only die to it while doing CAS.
Meanwhile 2S38 is much more obvious cancer soviet mains deny and pretend to not see.
The bagliets more mobile, lower profile, better gun depression.
Has decent atgms and has a decent penning round for an autocannon, even if it is just AP.
The 2s38 while a strong light tank is not much better, they’re A symetrical of one another.
Plus the 2s38 has worse survivability after the plethora of nerfs its had since release.
The Bagliets easily could sit at 10.0 and be fine.
Before you say im a soviet main, i dont main any tree ive got every tree in game past at least rank 6 and 8 of the 10 at top tier.
The bagliets is a seriously potent vehicle.
Your replies to me remind me of when people wanted the Leopard 2k to move up in BR, you want your tank to stay at an easier / better BR and spite the rest.
@Normandy_Corsair is quite right in what he’s said so far as well as you’ve been spouting random stuff with next to no context.
On top of that the comments hes replied to from you, i cannot even see.
ok youre smoking something if you think i-tows are decent. one, theyre normal heat warheads, the second you face against ERA theyre completely useless, which is common at 9.7 let alone higher, where everything the russians have is covered with the shit, and two, I-tows have a 50/50 chance of just failing to launch and just dirt themselves. theyre at best a third weapon system you COULD use, not something you can rely on.
also the bagel doesnt have survivability either, the crew is exposed in the turret and the thing is made from paper, atleast the 2s38 has a crewless turret and a russian fuel tank in the front for protection. also finally, the ap has good pen, but the lack of velocity means ANY fight at range you will lose, period. its the reason why the bagel is considered so broken, because theyre lunch meat at range and insanely dangerous at close range so people dont ever remember the fights against bagels at ranges, because they die instantly, but only remember the times when theyre wiping whole sections of the enemy team at close range.
2 Likes
Thank you, I might add. 2S38 and people who complain about similar vehicles got OTOMATIC to have 12 APFSDS with 30 round readyrack AT 11.3.
Just because I shoot down 90% of all enemy CAS munition and can fight tanks, doesn’t mean ALL players now must suffer on OTOMATIC, gaijin made OTOMATIC having 90 APFSDS shells at some point to justify 2S38s full rack and ability to switch between rounds in a single feed HE conveyor belt with somehow APFSDS shells.
Now after “overpowering” Italy gigachad femboys, we have to perform even better in a significantly objectively worse tank. Gaijin balanced everything by statistics.
I-TOWs are useful, just stop attacking targets head-on. Also what are you smoking to think the Bagel isn’t survivable?