Differences between a plateform being able throughout several export variants, and some testing that never were made,… F-15A never recieved ever the VTAS,…
Yak-141 → photos of weapons mounted are available
F-5C variant recieved flares in several export subvariant
AIM-9M on Gripen C is to avoid having IRIS-T a Far superior missile on one and only aircraft.
R-27ER have been added because available on Russian Variant
Same with R-24 for MiG-23
You mean the A and C
The A had AIM-9L(i) which gajin refuse to add but functionally would be 9M with smoke
The C we have in game only ever used IRIS-T so it couldn’t get that so it got the same loadout as the A but with out the Swedish names
Other version of it had flares
the F15A in game is sort of like this as it shouldn’t have flares but it has the flares from the MSIP
AFAIK those were mockups.
Now show photos of IRST and HMD.
That wasn’t your original argument though.
So you admit that your argument just was wrong then?
Again that wasn’t your original argument.
The German migs did have the software for it
When you guys will understand the differences between → NEVER INSTALLED EVER // INSTALLED ON SOME VARIANT.
The ONLY USA aircraft that can Have HMD right now, through the form of VTAS would be F-14A → even then it is not possible as VTAS functionnalties requires a block of Hard/Software that were added for the only aircraft which make those trials, and is not available on the Serial F-14A/B or even D.
F-15A NEVER EVER got VTAS installed, as the trials made on USN F-14A were looked upon from USAF, and they decided that it was not worth to integrate it.
If you look, the VTAS only ever been proposed, and AIMVAL test-campaign make it possible to check feasibility, without making it in Hard.
→ F-15A is inelligible to VTAS as is F-14A since it is not equipped with the required Module for VTAS to work.
My argument is STILL the same since start:
Now if you want to be stupid go on,… i’m done explainning the same thing 3 times on to you and your desperate colleagues.
So show me pictures of IRST and HMD on 141.
And my point still stands.
No reason to be so hostile.
Apart that i’m saying 3 times the same thing , and that you try to put word in my mouth?
Yes,… sure,…
It’s a forum intended for arguments and discussions. Not everyone is going to read the entire 800 whatever post thread.
Deal with it.
Quote me.
As you asked.
Bud… It literally wasnt lmao.
not al the time their is alot that missing stuff
Yeah sure let’s make the best jet in game even better.
I assume you are also advocating with an increase to 13.0-13.3 for the gripen alongside as well?
Only if it gets BOL back as well.
When did the Gripen stop being from Europe? Did Sweden move away from the continent?
Or the Leopard 2s? Did Sweden convince Germany to move out of europe as well?
They keep nerfing the Gripen though.
It is still the best tho
Maybe because it’s easily the best jet at top tier?
you still need some skill it is not like you have 10 missiles
And?
Should be historically accurate to IRL. It’s not.
(Especially the BOL nerfs which have affected more than just the Gripen)
Not my fault the US and USSR can’t build equal aircraft.
Just wait till typhoon and Rafale. Though they are going to be heavily, artificially nerfed as well.