Battle Rating changes for January 2024 (post feedback)

[Cpt_Bel_V]

When you guys will understand the differences between → NEVER INSTALLED EVER // INSTALLED ON SOME VARIANT.

The ONLY USA aircraft that can Have HMD right now, through the form of VTAS would be F-14A → even then it is not possible as VTAS functionnalties requires a block of Hard/Software that were added for the only aircraft which make those trials, and is not available on the Serial F-14A/B or even D.

F-15A NEVER EVER got VTAS installed, as the trials made on USN F-14A were looked upon from USAF, and they decided that it was not worth to integrate it.

If you look, the VTAS only ever been proposed, and AIMVAL test-campaign make it possible to check feasibility, without making it in Hard.

→ F-15A is inelligible to VTAS as is F-14A since it is not equipped with the required Module for VTAS to work.

My argument is STILL the same since start:

@Cpt_Bel_V

But that’s technically impossible, as much as F-15A never recieved such system on-board,…

Now if you want to be stupid go on,… i’m done explainning the same thing 3 times on to you and your desperate colleagues.

[Kanelikainalo-psn]

@Cpt_Bel_V

When you guys will understand the differences between → NEVER INSTALLED EVER // INSTALLED ON SOME VARIANT.

So show me pictures of IRST and HMD on 141.

@Cpt_Bel_V

My argument is STILL the same since start:

And my point still stands.

@Cpt_Bel_V

Are you stupid not to see that Gaijin only add systems that were onto aircrafts already IRL?

@Kanelikainalo

Clearly that’s not true anymore.

@Cpt_Bel_V

Now if you want to be stupid go on,… i’m done explainning the same thing 3 times on to you and your desperate colleagues.

No reason to be so hostile.

[Cpt_Bel_V]

@Kanelikainalo

No reason to be so hostile.

Apart that i’m saying 3 times the same thing , and that you try to put word in my mouth?

Yes,… sure,…

[Kanelikainalo-psn]

@Cpt_Bel_V

Apart that i’m saying 3 times the same thing ,

It’s a forum intended for arguments and discussions. Not everyone is going to read the entire 800 whatever post thread.

Deal with it.

@Cpt_Bel_V

and that you try to put word in my mouth?

Quote me.

[Cpt_Bel_V]

@Kanelikainalo

Quote me.

@Kanelikainalo

So you admit that your argument just was wrong then?

@Kanelikainalo

That wasn’t your original argument though

@Kanelikainalo

Again that wasn’t your original argument

As you asked.

[Kanelikainalo-psn]

@Cpt_Bel_V

@Kanelikainalo

Quote me.

@Kanelikainalo

So you admit that your argument just was wrong then?

@Kanelikainalo

That wasn’t your original argument though

Kanelikainalo:

Bud… It literally wasnt lmao.

@Cpt_Bel_V

Are you stupid not to see that Gaijin only add systems that were onto aircrafts already IRL?

[Mytho-GR1]

@Cpt_Bel_V

Are you stupid not to see that Gaijin only add systems that were onto aircrafts already IRL?

not al the time their is alot that missing stuff

[_Renzo]

Yeah sure let’s make the best jet in game even better.

I assume you are also advocating with an increase to 13.0-13.3 for the gripen alongside as well?

[Morvran]

Only if it gets BOL back as well.

[_Renzo]

When did the Gripen stop being from Europe? Did Sweden move away from the continent?

Or the Leopard 2s? Did Sweden convince Germany to move out of europe as well?

[Morvran]

They keep nerfing the Gripen though.

[MrKrabsPattys]

It is still the best tho

[_Renzo]

Maybe because it’s easily the best jet at top tier?

[MrKrabsPattys]

you still need some skill it is not like you have 10 missiles

[Morvran]

And?

Should be historically accurate to IRL. It’s not.

(Especially the BOL nerfs which have affected more than just the Gripen)

Not my fault the US and USSR can’t build equal aircraft.

Just wait till typhoon and Rafale. Though they are going to be heavily, artificially nerfed as well.

[_Renzo]

@Morvran

Not my fault the US and USSR can’t build equal aircraft.

Yet I assume that if they were to add for example the F-22 together with the Eurofighter you wpuld be the first to complain about it not being fair.

The brain wiring of single nation mains continues to be interesting.

[Morvran]

And I’m sure if they added the F22, US mains would still complain about not having HMD

Besides, if that happened, US mains would complain about ASRAAM and Meteor.

[_Renzo]

Eh I haven’t seen US mains complain about not getting HMD here, I have only seen people state it as a possible reason for the F-15A being 12.3.

The only one I mostly see complain here at the moment is you.

[Morvran]

99% of US mains are complaining about the lack of HMD on the F15 and it being the primary reason for it being 12.3 and not 12.7. it should 100% be 12.7 though. 0 reason for it to be 12.3.

[Firestarter]

@_Renzo

The brain wiring of single nation mains continues to be interesting.

I mean, that could be applied to… every nation pretty much. The only ones I haven’t seen complain are Italians, who just… I assume accepted their fate when the F-104s came out.

It just so happens that Brits feel (quite reasonably) hard done by, having to choose between a Brick, an even shorter ranged Brick, and a Harrier until this patch.

@_Renzo

Yet I assume that if they were to add for example the F-22 together with the Eurofighter you wpuld be the first to complain about it not being fair.

On balance Morvran probably would. Then again so would every British, Italian and German Air main worth their salt. Because they just aren’t comparable. A quick glance over their basic characteristics would tell you that.

Then again, no doubt everyone would either be horrified or delighted at the idea of a missile with a NEZ of around 60 km. And ASRAAM having perhaps the longest range of Western IR missiles and being virtually unflarable.

Funny old thing, the Europeans can turn out a good aircraft when they bother their arses every now and then…