Lmao no char is still going to 8.0 for some dumb reason
3 Likes
Wow these changes still look awful thanks for this
4 Likes
Those are reload buffs mate
1 Like
Is there any chance that the type-16(fps) will receive the type-93 shell and move up to 9.7?
1 Like
Ah, my bad.
They’re still trash vehicles regardless.
One of the highlights for me. Thank you!
I, however, would insist to further decompress the ground BRs by expanding their range, as many others have already pointed out.
Arietes are not equivalents to Strv 122s; M1A1 HC is not equivalent to Leopard 2A7V, and IPM1 shouldn’t go into battle against T-80BVMs and T-90Ms.
Top tier decompression via BR range expansion should also, finally, decompress the mid tiers. In the past year, compression has done nothing but to move from one BR bracket to another. We need to expand the BRs so that we may finally decompress ALL the BRs without compressing any others in exchange!
1 Like
Replacing one letter is still possible.
And it’s not going to happen,… you should know it ^^"
I didnt even think 2S25M can use 3BM60 oh wow.
This thing is so unpopular anyway.
Glad to see Strela moving up, but I think it should get its sensors.
I believe more french tanks should be removed from the list.
New plane for 500k research points for HMD amd Amraam?
1 Like
So do you also think they should lower the T-80BVM to 11.3 because soviet teams are performing bad right now?
1 Like
Yes
1 Like
It’s clear that Gaijin has forgotten about what they used to be played with by the efficiency of the Italian CL-13 of some players
gaijin, gaijin never changes
3 Likes
Is there a way to check the current situation of the su-22m3 (USSR squadron jet) ?
Because currently the BR (10.7) that it stands at is quite bad,
Whether that maybe for doing CAS roles or ARB battles.
Like, for CAS roles, it gets Kh-29 and Kh-25, they are yes good AGMs, but it still needs good optics to use them, the current optics on the su-22m3 is misplaced, and has no zoom levels, making the only way to use them, is up and close, making it quite vulnerable to enemy fire.
So, as a long time user of it, I just use unguided bombs and rockets for CAS, and that makes it no better than 10.0 or 9.7 CAS planes.
As for ARB, most of the times you play, the plane is way slower than most planes in its BR (unless we talk about su-25 and A-10), has bad maneuverability compared to them as well as bad weaponry,
R-60 at 10.7 is as good as not being there (I replace my 4 R60 for gun pods, they are more reliable), any flare on the battle, whether near the fired upon plane or not, immediately makes the missile go for it, if you fire at anything more than 1.2km away, and you need to fire upon unsuspecting targets, the missile won’t reach, let’s not talk about the majority of battles which it gets as up-tiers, making it face all-aspect and radar missiles, and sometimes AIM-9M and Magic 2s (with only 12 flares fired in 2s or 4s).
Then, let’s talk about its main role, ground pounding in ARB, since it stands at 10.7, most of the time you get F-4S and its variants, Tornado and its variants, and more, each plane is faster than the SU-22M3 and sometimes with enough bomb load for 2 or 3 bases, making you just either leave at start of the battle, or go for head-ons against enemies.
What would I expect that makes the plane better again, or have 10.7 as a justified br.
the plane having its BR adjusted to 10.0, since its effective upgrade over SU-7 is CCRP and CCIP and more carrying capacity.
Or having better optics (for GRB) and R-60M for Air battles (at least in place of the pylons designated for carrying 1 R60 each).
So many people complained how it didn’t have APCR, unlike the Jumbo 76 and M4A3 (76), that Gaijin obliged and gave it M93 even though it’s basically meaningless.
But that doesn’t matter. As the older BR changes showed, the T20 is going to 6.3, whether that is with APCR or without it.
everyone should just make an effort to do really bad with 7.7, or now 8.0 France so they lower them
3 Likes
So the 29g goes up despite having a near useless rwr, basically zero countermeasures for the br, and zero ground attack options and zero room for improvement via better armament because the r73 which is lackluster as hell? R73 doesn’t warrant a .7 br jump from the 9.12A, .3 I can agree with.
1 Like
In fairness, the AMX-30 also has no armor, no stab, no LRF, or those rounds and does fine at 8.0.
However it at least gets better mobility, a good HEAT (not heat-fs) round, coincidence range-finder and a co-ax 20mm. I do agree that the AMX 50 and Char 25t still don’t deserve 8.0.
1 Like
i hope thats a joke, the Mig 29G has the worst countermeasures out of all 12.3 and 12.7 aircraft, those are the same number of countermeasures as the standard Mig 29 has.
If its like that then the russian Mig 29SMT should be increased to 13.0 at one point because of R-73, even more countermeasures and the A2G armament
Literaly every other 12.7 aircraft is a multirole fighter, while the Mig 29G is only an A2A fighter, there is a giant disrepancy between all other 12.7 aircraft and the Mig 29G
3 Likes
the AMX-50 (TO90/930) is slower, less-ish armored, and has no HEAT of any kind there’s no reason for it to be the same br