will you be adding stock aphe, stabilizer and heatfs to char 25t to make it on par with object 906?
2 Likes
F-15A never had HMD does it?
Only F-15C and E were provided with HMD/S systems
from all i see, none were ever used on F-15A (even the VTAS used on F-4J/F-4S USN aircrafts, and thought for both F-15A/F-14,… but the 2 last got denied before VTAS even reached a cockpit)
Hi
Would it be possible to get a comment as to why isn’t 2S38 being moved up?
Sorry for bothering
2 Likes
wait yeah Char 25t will be same BR as the 906 now 💀
4 Likes
Arleady made on Russian forum, but not here. Fun.
It’s completely different from a Panther, and should be played differently as such.
1 Like
So… 10.0 light tank gets 3BM60, but AGS at 11.0 now is stuck with practically useless M833 fighting LEO2A7 etc…
I see no problems with this. /s.
9 Likes
why are aircrafts such as A6M2 (1940 early war aircrafts) still set to fight P-51D-20/-30 (late/post war models?)
the BR’s currently are set by the results, yet, there is some incredible overlook of the ability of players.
Most USA/Russian players are very inexperienced,… this is not true for everyone else - why trying to keep a BR balance model flawed like this?
if you can ask/have an explannation over “how” you calculte BR - it would be great to see if we can add some new parameters.
Every BR changes we implement are “touched” by players feedback. We always open feedback thread and after we gather feedback, devs adjust changes.
1 Like
Thanks for considering our feedback, the list has certainly improved.
Even then there are still decisions that don’t make sense to me, and some glaring omissions.
Firstly, the 2S38 is way too strong for it’s current BR. It is equal and in some cases superior to HSTV-L both in terms of performance and most importantly it’s overall combat utility. You would expect the BR to reflect that. The 2S38 should be going up to meet HSTV-L at 11.3, or both meet each other halfway at 10.7 or 11.0.
Also, the Chinese M60A3 TTS is still inferior to the US counterpart at the same BR, changing the order of researchable modifications doesn’t change the performance in any way. My suggestion is to either give the Chinese vehicle M774 and researchable ERA module, or lower BR to 8.7.
You were on to something with the F-5E, it should be going to 11.0.
The F-5C is also ridiculously strong at 10.3, either it should go up to 10.7, or have it’s performance nerfed in some way.
T20 has no place at 6.3, even with APCR which is a sidegrade at best. The T20 should stay at 6.0, and the M26 reverted back to 6.3.
10 Likes
Alright, so if the falcon is going up to 8.3 (AA, no radar) then can we assume that every other nations AA around the rank, is going up? take the ZSU-37-2 first, 37MM with Radar, or the M-163 which has radar…
2 Likes
i would prefer bumping A-10’s A-6’s and Su-25’s than F-5’s,…
2 Likes
i feel like a broken record at this point but HOW does the somua and ebr stay at 7.7 but the two other with 210mm pen goes to the same br as an Obj 906? no idea why the sudden hate bonner for the BC25t is comming from its been 3 br changes gaijin is trying to dunk on it. Cant wait to face T-55 point n clicking me with their full stab at the same br.
1 Like
Both. Both is good.
It would still be better to have a discussion about the proposed changes first and then a discussion about potential new changes from the community.
This way is incredible inefficient and I doubt that all 1400 replies were read and taken into consideration.
It would make the job of the poor intern or who reads all the replies easier aswell
4 Likes
2S38 is significantly slower, larger, and less survivable (though the fuel tank eats a lot of stuff it shouldn’t) than the HSTV-L. the 2S38 definitely does need to go up, but it’s not equal to the HSTV-L
1 Like
both would be okay.
(MiG-21MF and superior also should get bumped by 1 step,… in my book, even the Mig-21F13 and -PFM and -S should be bumped → currently doing 2 KD in MiG-21F13,… a “difficult” aircraft to play,…)
[EDIT: Along similar one in chinese TT]
Ingame JAS39A HMD moment. Or just change one letter in name.
How is the AMX (the 10.3 plane) not going up? Two 9Ls and laser guided munitions at 10.3 is crazy low… 10.7 at the minimum Gaijn come on…
1 Like
Proposed changes ONLY FOR RB.
(Japanse Tiger premiun aka Heavy Tank No. 6) move from 6.0 to 5.7 = His model is more closer to H1 than E, suffer from nasty and useless “S-minen” launches can block his gun in critical situations with terrible consequences or just move the stupid “S-minen” .
(SPz LG3 12-3) move from 6.7 to 6.3 = This tank is extremly bad, long reload, poor post pen and mediocre movility is ridiculous he stay in 6.7 when you have by far better options in low BRs. For example M41 with HEAT, faster reload and movility is 6.3 or the Jagdpanzer 90 in 6.3 too. In another trees you cand find faster and more powerfull HEAT slingers in 6.0 , so is senseless 6.7 for this crap tank.
(ARL 44) move from 5.3 to 5.0 = Big turret with poor armor and bad movility plus reload speed.
(Vidar) move from 8.0 to 8.7 = Really dont need any explanation.
1 Like