No idea.
1 Like
The funy thingbis that most of them are copy paste with diferent skins
All the F5s overperform a lot as well
1 Like
Now back to subject if we ever saw a GR9A without ASRAAMs like a E version for Early what BR would it be in ?
13.0 ?
12.7 ?
1 Like
12.7 same as gr7
Where does that go then?
TERMA was carried on the Starboard strake/gunpod position
Shown there with DJRP centrline and Sniper on the Port strake/gunpod pos
1 Like
I dont think 940 CMs + all-aspect MAWS on the Gr9A is enough, Any more CMs we could get? :P
i think thats enough flares to light up the nights sky and chaff to have an ecological disaster already mate.
2 Likes
Hehe, but need more :P
I mean GR9 with 5x BOL and a phimat would be incredible. were those CM pods we see on the matadors ever mounted on British harriers as that adds even more
Do we have a report up for the max AOA being limited to 18 instead of 25 ?
i have all the UK harriers and except the GR7 they are all bricks is that how they where?
Haha, shame no BOL was ever fitted to those extra 2 pylons :D
Or just imagine a BOL on every Pylon. So 8x BOL + Terma :D
1 Like
dont tell them that. BOL on every missile rail is how it really happens
2 Likes
Will this reduce Harrier IR signature?
- Yes
- No
0
voters
It propably would. At least a little, At least if how we think the IR signatures work is right. But still probably not enough.
4 Likes
According to the history of Gaijin’s balancing
-Losing some thrust in station
-but no extra thrust in higher speed
-The code got fuzzy again, as always and gets no reduction on IR signature enough.
3 Likes
Should’ve had Northrop make the harrier
Yeah, Gaijin loves to bias some selected jets from Northrop
and if Northrop built Harrier
Then ion-thruster from F-5 will heavily helpful for dealing with the IR problem of the harrier XD
3 Likes