BAe Harrier II (UK versions) - Technical data and discussion

No I completely understand I really want the Indian FRS.51 for a more mid level radar slinging shar as the FA.2 is a little painful at 13.0 lol.

The Indians where also a bit more clever and used a lighter radar and a significantly more practical missile configuration.

1 Like

Exactly, why do we have a ton of f F5 everywhere and not some more harriers in the UK tree

2 Likes

No idea.

1 Like

The funy thingbis that most of them are copy paste with diferent skins

All the F5s overperform a lot as well

1 Like

Now back to subject if we ever saw a GR9A without ASRAAMs like a E version for Early what BR would it be in ?

13.0 ?
12.7 ?

1 Like

12.7 same as gr7

Where does that go then?

TERMA was carried on the Starboard strake/gunpod position
Shown there with DJRP centrline and Sniper on the Port strake/gunpod pos

1 Like

I dont think 940 CMs + all-aspect MAWS on the Gr9A is enough, Any more CMs we could get? :P

i think thats enough flares to light up the nights sky and chaff to have an ecological disaster already mate.

2 Likes

Hehe, but need more :P

I mean GR9 with 5x BOL and a phimat would be incredible. were those CM pods we see on the matadors ever mounted on British harriers as that adds even more

Do we have a report up for the max AOA being limited to 18 instead of 25 ?
i have all the UK harriers and except the GR7 they are all bricks is that how they where?

Haha, shame no BOL was ever fitted to those extra 2 pylons :D

Or just imagine a BOL on every Pylon. So 8x BOL + Terma :D

1 Like

dont tell them that. BOL on every missile rail is how it really happens

2 Likes

Nerf the Harrier
Harriers (All Marks) Installed thrust too high // Gaijin.net // Issues

1 Like

Will this reduce Harrier IR signature?

  • Yes
  • No
0 voters

It propably would. At least a little, At least if how we think the IR signatures work is right. But still probably not enough.

4 Likes

According to the history of Gaijin’s balancing

-Losing some thrust in station
-but no extra thrust in higher speed
-The code got fuzzy again, as always and gets no reduction on IR signature enough.

3 Likes