But in a way, you’re right. China really doesn’t need the whole ASEAN, we just want a powerful enough MBT (at least in my mind), and we have better products for all the other ground players except the MBT.
2 Likes
Honestly leopards should not go to a redfor nation like at all just wait till your military industrial complex show off a new tank
2 Likes
gaijin refused to work on it seriously, as can be seen from the 99A and VT4. So I (and we) were hoping to get a tank that wouldn’t be fudged by gaijin, and obviously the Leopard 2 was the best choice
1 Like
🇹🇼🇹🇼🇹🇼🇹🇼👀👀👀
5 Likes
I feel like this whole convo is legit going no where lol
1 Like
Turned to a china suffer thing yeah
I think it might be a good idea to consider a united Korean subtree for the united Chinese tree. The split between North/South Korea would fit well into the tree already being the split PRC/ROC.
It is actually a case where I believe the blufor part of the subtree works well since it mirrors the way the Chinese tree is set up directly.
Arguably there is still Oplot-P from Pakistan that nobody would refuse.
But for the Korea idea, I believe the K1/K2, as well as M2020 MBTs would help China more than the ASEAN Leopards could.
2 Likes
China should really have its M1 Abrams, no reason why it shouldnt have it. Bit of a tangent lol
2 Likes
i mean its a newer abrams, will come witht the US SEPv3 probably
2 Likes
Taiwan just very recently got its abrams, thats the only reason why it shouldnt have had them until recently.
Abrams for taiwan and vt 4 for japan and i am happy in that happy for everyone equaly
3 Likes
+1, hardwork 🫡
3 Likes
Where would Vietnam go then? lol
So could you explain to those unaware why Chinese MBTs are bad? Many MBTs in the game are fudged. Type 90/10 armor is certainly wrong, for example
2 Likes
Yes, a lot of tanks in this game are wrong. But you know what? When gaijin announced that they were going to fix the 99A’s problems, they just added a little bit of paltry armor to the gun latch and then reduced the 99A’s main protection area by 200ke. Trust me, if Gaijin treats 90/10 like that, you’ll be disappointed and angry too.
2 Likes
I agree with the addition of Thailand’s VT4 for Japan.
2 Likes
Aside from the M2020, others are really a good idea.
2 Likes
israel,it’s simple,if you say vietnam going in china techtree,then gaijin will make everyone angry because all Vietnam stuff is Soviet stuff and china already have it in their techtree
Israel is a good option because we can give them soviet stuff like t3485,2s1,2s3m,su85,su100,etc…, to make the line up more ez to fit
also we have pretty fine relationship with israel so you may see a special T54 with ERA,thermal and 105mm canon as premium
and an option give israel players an t90s version,not bat isn’t it ?
2 Likes
You seem to have forgotten about the 360 Type 59 tanks and 180 Type 62 light tanks that China aided. There are also 380 Type 63 light tanks.
1 Like
This is a good guy. But I’ve heard that a lot of the main American forces think it’s too weak. Also recently I’ve been working on the American tech tree, I’m really going crazy with hydraulics, can’t the M1 rotate the turret manually?
It not weak it just people don’t know how to play the tank. I play the abrams and i think it not bad, nothing special or anything
1 Like