And if your don’t like that you don’t deserve any ASEAN countries LOL, I think we already speaking “politely” due to the rule of the forums, we ASEAN usually only insulting each other, just ask RSS_Defender or NFrost51 or other ASEAN here how bad (good) is the ASEAN internet environment is LOL
That’s your business, I’ve kept my friendliness to the maximum, and I don’t think it’s a luxury to be civilized. Otherwise, you wouldn’t want to hear what we Chinese think of Southeast Asians.
Doesn’t change the fact that saying i deserved to get my post spam reported because of “bad claims” is kinda rude ngl
But yeah
if gaijin has any common sense at all singapore and malaysia are going to china/uk(maybe USA if only talking about F-15SG). i have put too much faith in gaijin in the past(Hoping for J-11B when we got J-11A instead, hoping for HQ-17A but HQ-17 getting added) but i genuinely doubt they would do something as absurd as putting singapore in Japan
Where i say that?
I said you got bad claims. Thats 2 different things
Singapore at least wont, no idea about malaysia. China has enough other subtree option like already getting a lot pakistanian stuff.
And the chinese tree exists out of 2 countries in the first place with chona and taiwan which provides 2 development lines.
China is one of the last nations in the need of a subtree. Hell its better of then germany in diversity.
Then u dont know gajin well
India to uk just saying
Dutch to france
Singapore makes comple sense becsuse its in a package deal of asean just like benelux
Funny thing but to most people singspore to japan makes more sense then to china. You are the minority.
More people prefer it to japan.
Including the singaporeans
Arguably Singapores most notable military ties as far as the game goes would be Thailand (placed in the Japanese tree) and Israel.
So reasonably Israel or Japan would be the ideal places for Singapore, since an independent ASEAN tree would be missing Thailand now.
It would still be an option to split vehicles to their nation of origin, but that wouldn’t work for Singaporean domestic vehicles and would split another nation across multiple trees which I personally don’t like.
This has already been discussed to be the exact reason this is the ASEAN Founders Sub-Tree. This makes it a package deal that doesn’t include all 10 ASEAN nations.
But I do understand the needs the Chinese tree has, and what they expect from Singapore. I am also working on a possible idea to solve this issue through another nation, and I will hopefully be ready to present it on the forum soon.