Aim-9M costs 54 (it should cost 0)
R-Darter costs 0
AMRAAM costs 190 (it should cost 0)
So if you play Britain, Italy, US, Japan and Israel. Sucks to be you.
Though Germany can sometimes do something, its rare. So that just means that Sweden, China and France have something might be of use. Still not great for most nations.
Its accurate to all available IRL data and its funny watching people try and nerf the Typhoon only to get rejected because they are using bad sources or the fact their data does nothing to actually argue against the data already submitted.
If Su-34 or Rafale can be at full power in terms of guided CAS. Then so should the Typhoon.
thats my name for the loadout as a joke seeing as the R darter is one of hte worst ARHs in game.
Yes so i have.
2 x aim9m and 4x R- darter and it costs 54. in a custom loadout.
Yet with the premade loadout with 2x aim 9M and 2x R darter it costs 190.
The adats missile buff has imrpoved the capability of the missile in closer quarters so when someones actually in engement range. but yeah unfortunately mate it does suck. the Type 81 for japan is my next spaa and its lethal apparently if used right.
Im sorry but the VT1 thrower for germany ive seen do plenty in many matches, as for the ITO and TOR they are absolutely good SPAA, not a case of “might be of use” they are of massive use to teams.
Rafale isnt as far as im aware at its full capabilities.
and again, saying the typhoon should be at its full power in terms of guided munitions means 18 x brimstones FnF .
which obviously isnt balanced.
Personally id rather see all of these gen 4.5s and gen 4 strike craft removed from GRB as they are nothing but a bloody plague.
regardless of spaa or tank you use.
We need a balancing patch or overhaul for the game at this stage. its ridiculous that all of this nonsense is on going.
and im sure the tanks are all fighting in 16v16 matches in random locations across the world in random war games with random teams.
its semi realistic for a reason mate.
I dont want the typhoon OR any of these jets to stupid power houses.
But complaining about hte Gs the typhoon pulls while the F15s can pull 14Gs just aint it mate.
So, Su-27SM is perfectly fine at top tier and there is no need for a new top tier aircraft for the soviets. If you arent happy with the state of the Su-27SM you just have to be happy with what you had for once.
Since the 2 nations I play only have it That’s kinda irrelevant to my initial post
Yes the rafale player made a mistake and was dumb enough to get close, still does not change how much easier to use the KH38 its self even to the lowest common denominator of player. I’m not not spawning spaa multiple times on the off chance he goes brain dead or gets cocky
Maybe they know they’re weak missiles lol. Idk what be the gripen is. Is it 14.0 or 13.7? That could be why.
Id never take aim9’s only because it means I have to get within a few km’s and hope tws doesn’t pop my location then I have to defend ARH without any ability to put them defensive. ARH is the most logical and sensible equipment.
I saw the screenshot, I’ve seen plenty of 6 man wipes with su34. They’re just demonstrably way better missiles even if the platform is lacking comparatively. Especially since best SPAA is on their team.
Which leads me to my next point, the lethality aspect of the type81c you’re referring to is almost non existent lol. Mk1 eyeballs means they need to be in visual range. The missile can only effectively really work to 6 or saw for a good lock. Meaning you’re never gonna take care of helis, and you can still kinematically dodge those missiles quite easily. Take it on a turn and pop 2 flares and change direction quickly. It’s really not that good, “used correctly” just means “hit someone not paying attention.”
Japan is Israel are lacking so incredibly that if someone somehow made a match of only Japan and Israel. They literally could not mount a defense against helis and jets.