What does that have to do with the conversation at hand. There are no bombers at top tier lol. You are creating fallacies to forward your argument.
Hollup, what does top tier have to do with bombers who disappear after 9.0
1 Like
Dont lie now, because it is easy to look up
Because that is what is going to tell me about what you know about Air RB?..and not Ground Play Warthunder.
There are already like a dozen of this threads. Reply to those rather than making a new one.
They did go too far with the damage model but i think you are a bit hyperbolic. Just because it doesnt say “aircraft destroyed” doesnt mean you have to keep sitting behind them and firing.
I usually start some engine fires then leave. They end up going down a bit later.
It depends a lot on how it was built. A double decker bus is larger than an abrams. Doesnt mean the double decker bus can take a 150mm HEATFS round better than an abrams.
But these stats make you the authority on Air? But because I haven’t played top tier air I get no voice? Lol
Based off size weight and what it’s made of, as I’ve said many times already.
No I don’t record random gameplay
100% of all angles irl result in bomber disintegration, there is no such thing as a correct angle.
And structure. I think that is the part getting hung up on.
markimash…you seem to be to me…looking at your threads throughout the years to just accept anything Warthunder will throw at you…a Warthunder sycophant to be quite honest
Why
I mean, if you can help get us past this miscommunication please help. I feel like I’m arguing with a brick wall and I’m sure Normandy Corsair feels similarly.
Lol. Im still waiting for gaijin to fix the missiles they broke over a year ago and keep breaking more.
Plus them making naval near unplayble and brain dead.
I just dont spam the forum about everything i dont like.
1 Like
OKAY, THIS IS NOT A REPLY TO YOU BUT TO ALL,I have poured a total of 3000 rounds or so of Good German Cannon into these fighters and I have 165 fps on my PC and I am a damn good fighter…but that is ridiculous…and I suggest you all look at Gaijins Financial Picture .
That said…I respect all you comments and THANK YOU for participating in this thread.
THIS IS FOR ALL TO SEE
Ok but then why respond to me instead of just replying to the thread itself
1 Like
I believe it started from what seemed to be you suggesting a blanket “if bigger, more hp”.
I think we can all agree it would best be done on a plane by plane basis. Though, knowing gaijin, this would take years.
Because there’s literally just more material there that requires damaging? You think if a hole appears at all in the airfoil of a plane with the wingspan the length of a city block is just gonna give up lift entirely?
Really? Mate, as many conversations as weve had, do you think Im going to sit behind a bomber and fire?
Cmon Man,You know Im not that damn dumb
Ngl, adding this makes it appear like you believe more fps gives you more dps.
1 Like
I mean
This sounds like a long time.
1 Like