No, I don’t play like you.
Ey, Britiain prop tree has lots of strong options, and some planes are plain easy,
But calling British prop tree as 'Most overpowered of any nation" or “Spitty need to get full 1.0BR nerf” is delulu take, mate.
There is also the Soviet tech tree with the infamous Yakovlevs, or the American Tech tree, where ‘underrated by playerbase skill issue’ planes exist.
British Tech tree is more a easy starter. just like japanese tech tree, easy to play, but hard to master.
-Seafire LF Mk.III in 6.0BR(5.0->6.0) and facing P-51H-5 in 0.3BR higher, or
-Sending Spitfire LF Mk.IX from 6.0 to 7.0 and let them share the same BR with F-84B or F-80A, while +0.7BR higher than P-51H
-Sending Spitfire Mk.24 from 6.7 to 7.7 and let them have even higher BR than F2H Banshee, which is on 7.3BR and is notoriously known as underrated.
Seriously?
3 Likes
Yes, Yaks are really strong, but if we’re being real, there’s basically no circumstance where a Yak-3 has the edge over a Spitfire.
Japan has good turning but no speed.
Germany has good climb but no turning.
America has good speed but no climb.
Spitfire can claim all three. The Spitfire LF Mk.9 could easily move to 5.7 and still be good.
Yes, Send Spitfire LF Mk.9 from 6.0 to 5.7.
Reverting the nerf.
Thanks for your cooperation in making a better british tech tree.
4 Likes
Good news for you, its 6.0 and the uptiers vs jets suck
3 Likes
Thank you for knowing nothing about the topic at hand.
Thats the F mk9 and not the LF mk9. the F mk9 does not get the same kind of climb rate
1 Like
Weren’t that a ‘F Mk.9’, not ‘LF Mk.9’?
Funnily enough thats not an lf
2 Likes
I know. I’m guessing that you, however, just don’t know what the word “raise” means. The word “raise” means to be brought from lower to higher. So, for example, changing a vehicle’s BR from 4.3 to 5.7 would be “raising” its BR.
Now that you know the meaning of “raise,” you should be able to context clues like “raising to 5.7” to deduce that the vehicle being talked about was below 5.7.
Get the variant right and there wont be any confusion
1 Like
I wouldn’t think a simple typo would be too hard to see past with contextual clues. Though, it’s not unlike Stock to try and twist words for the sake of making a bad faith argument.
I didn’t know we could talk to ourselves here.
Considering that “simple typo” relates to a completely different aircraft in this case it means a lot
3 Likes
The British tech tree is definitely worth it, even if it requires some getting used to for naval and ground, considering you’re often just below the meta, but at almost all ranks for both you get competitive vehicles and other vehicles which make for fun to play lineups in Arcade, ground and especially simulator.
As for air they have one of the most fleshed out tech trees out of all nations, with numerous options at each rank, so for most play-styles you’ll find something at each rank, making it very versatile to learn all what air combat has to offer. As for actual meta? They do have some strong planes, but those generally have decent counters in other nations at the same BR’s or lower, so it’s not like you’re always the strongest in town in ARB or ASB.
As someone that started the British tech tree on my current account in 2016 for wanting of playing the spitfire and the Churchill, it’s a very fun one to play!
4 Likes
Single letter difference between two popular planes held by multiple nations. It shouldn’t be difficult to understand.
On that WE CAN agree with.
Do you roll your face across the keyboard or get a pet to play the props for you? Because you demonstrate a singular inability to understand the subject you are pontificating about.
3 Likes
You heard it here first folks. P-51A is exactly the same as the P-51H so all Mustangs should be 6.3
6 Likes
Well it has a spinny thing on the front - what more do you want? Same thing really.
*Pangolin Stronk Logik c. 2026
If someone accidentaly types P-51A when talking about H or P-51H when talking about A, and you fail to recognize it’s a typo, then that’s honestly just on you.