Oh they don’t care about this game. Only big entity is Russia’s gov/military. No one else has the time and care for an obscure game like this.
1 Like
Gaijin has a huge number of employees - former employees of the Russian government or people associated with it.
You can search for materials about the dismissal of Keofox. It’s mentioned there.
3 Likes
Formally, if some plane/tank/ship is poorly played - Gaijin damages the brand’s corporate image, and this violates the trademark license).
https://www.boeing.com/terms-of-submission-and-privacy-policy/site-terms
1 Like
thats the kind of comment you get from someone who hasn’t read three lines of the documentation used to fix the plane and just comes here to spew nonsense…
Gaijin is definitely a crappy and totally arbitrary company, but being a fanatic and not taking five minutes to think before posting on the forum doesn’t help at all either. Sew up the American or NATO panties you tore off over your head after reading the title of this thread, relax your mind, and try thinking of something more useful to actually fix this game’s awful situation.
The current situation is a consequence of Gaijin’s global policy, which has turned normal game into Slavik’s next political game. The flag has absolutely nothing to do with it.
For example, for USA for absolutely incomprehensible reasons, does not provide any effective modern weapons, so they throw GPS bombs from 11.0-11.7 on the top tier.
And I’m not talking about the many attempts to push imbalance types of weapons for USSR, bypassing other nations.
In a few months the F22 is going to crush everyone and you’ll forget what you’re saying now lol, Its got nothing to do with politics, its just about scamming bad players by selling premiums, its as simple as that.
1 Like
Yes, yes, do we believe?
Given Gaijin’s current policy, we will get early F-22 versus late Su-57.
This one does not interfere with the other.
lol
dude, there are three european countries flying a eurofighter that doesnt even is operational
1 Like
Yea this was already seen like a year ago or something, its nothing new
https://x.com/GaijinEnt/status/1916577746375070147?s=20 here Is gaijin response
Besides, what does a sticker on the side of a truck have to do with the flanker’s performance?
Spread your theories elsewhere
So what?
They use SPICE-250 and Brimstone, but for “some reason” USA did not receive JAGM-F and GBU-53.
Should I remind you about tracking targets on M1A2 and 2A7, which Gaijin allegedly did not find information about?
Sure they pubicly claim that. But cmon this is a military parade. I know the US would be extremely cautious on company representations. If this was a prank by a russian service member though that would just be really funny haha
Im clearly talking about the differences between real data results from live WT vs inacurate statshark data. Statshark is trying to simulate what happens in game, not in real life.
You missed the point. That is me saying that the su27sm has similar STR to the gripen. You keep distorting my words.
I was just pointing that. Which means that the gripen high speed curves are mostly accurate. But not for the su27sm.
Why are you trying so hard to make what I posted sound like nonsense? I literally posted videos, do you have some kind of investment in pushing wrong information about these FMs for some reason?
1 Like
Sure and by doing that you can also see how the plane in game should more or less behave compared to it’s irl counterpart
Which barely matters when the flanker Will still lose in most scenarios, you also seems to ignore the gripen itself overperforming in STR
Sounds like more cope rather than nonsense tbh
You’re obsessing over a singular thing while ignoring many others
as i said, if u think Its so wrong feel free to bug report it
3 Likes
It should be roughly correct
should be yes
You keep taking my points out of context…
I never said the flanker is a better dogfighter than the gripen.
I said the 27SM has similar STR as the gripen across most speeds (a bit higher at high speeds)
You kept saying the flanker has lower STRs while looking at inaccurate StatShark turn graphs. I just proved that wrong with some videos to make my point.
I can’t talk about how these jets perform IRL, but it does feel weird the levels of energy retention they have in game when comparing to much lighter jets that are known for their sustained high G maneuver capabilities.
Maybe flankers have too little drag, which would also explain their overperforming top speed and high speed STR, if engine thrust is correct. Increasing drag would allow them to keep good energy retention at slow speeds while correcting it at high speeds.
If gaijin wants to keep them like this, fine, just balance them accordingly. Especially the 13.0 and 13.3 flankers, which are clearly undertiered when compared to their competition at the same BR, they were already too strong with their initial poor FM’s.
Also:
They mega buffed the Flankers but cant fix the Abrams LFP…
wanna test it? I got f-16 blk 10, 15, 20 and all flankers other than the first j-11 spaded
yes hop in
1 Like