After flopping and disappointing BR extension with many flaws came in a few weeks ago, Sea Harriers are having BR of
Sea Harrier FRS.1 (Early) [10.3->10.7]
Sea Harrier FRS.1 (Squadron) [10.7->11.3]
Sea Harrier FA.2 [12.3->13.0]
FRS.1 (Early) seems fine. it still has a mediocre Harrier fuselage with extra weight from radar… still, it flies better than A-10A, so 10.7BR is acceptable.
But, the rest of the sea harrier seems slightly higher BR than their specs.
For the Squadron version of Sea Harrier which is now on 11.3BR, of course, it flies faster than A-10A or A-6E and has two extra AIM-9L compared to the regular one(Which was added later)…
Seems 11.3BR is quite too much because Thailand F-5E with TWO Python-3 with Two AIM-9P4(All-aspect AIM-9P) shares the same BR brackets.
Of course, F-5E have significant differences in flight characteristics and can fly at supersonic speed while Sea Harrier FRS.1 can’t.
for Sea Harrier FRS.1, I think it has too high BR compared to spec. Seems to need a buff with J35XS.
and Sea Harrier FA.2. the latest AMRAAM one.
It was sharing the same 12.3BR and now shares the same 13.0 BR with American/Italian AV-8B+ Harrier II Plus.
As long as it can carry 4 AIM-120, it can’t be 12.7BR. I understand that.
AMRAAM might be a terrible disaster against MiG-23ML or Tornado IDS and they were when those ARH harriers were 12.3.
Still, Sea Harrier FA.2 is inferior in nearly all aspects compared to AV-8B+
- Worse outdated airframe with sluggish manoeuvrability.
- awful Anti-Air weaponry loadout compared to AV-8B+. (4 AIM-120 with 2 BOL/2 AIM-120 and 4 AIM-9M/2 AIM-120 2 with AIM-9M and 2 BOL/2 AIM-120 with 2 ADEN and 2 BOL/ 4 AIM-9M with 2 ADEN)
- unable to access the guide weaponry
- ADEN is a worse gun than GAU-12 and needs to cost two AMRAAM to mount it.
The only thing that Sea Harrier FA.2 better is… having more CM thanks to BOL pods.
This is an even bigger difference than [F-4J(UK) vs F-4S] and seems Sea Harrier FA.2 needs to be lower BR than AV-8B+. this difference can’t be ‘side-grading’.
Still, AV-8B+ also can’t be the same BR with F-4F ICE on 13.3 because AV-8B+ are subsonic jet. so seems Sea Harrier FA.2’s problem only can dealt with BR decompressing.
I am posting this topic to listen to your opinions or ideas.
- Sea Harrier FRS.1 has a Higher BR than it should
- Sea Harrier FRS.1 has a perfectly suited BR for it.
- Sea Harrier FA.2 has a Higher BR than it should
- Sea Harrier FA.2 is fine and needs to keep the same BR with AV-8B+
What do you think about this?