I remember when they said that they wont do any modern tanks or planes :)
1 Like
Because every single US main will start screaming as soon as they realise that their EXPORT Pantsir is not as good as the RU domestic Pantsir
And what are the differences?
Lemme take out my Export Pantsir brochure…
Lower range of the radar, worse missiles, number of tracked targets is lower…
Ofc Im just guessing but since its an export variant it certainly wont be the same as the domestic one. Nothing exported ever is
Are you mental ill? T-90S and Pantsir-S1E are in a totally different situation,
One while the T-90S is actually in service for the Indian army,
The captured Pantsir-S1E was only captured to analysis and tests, also, never was in US territory, accordingly to a user it was transferred to a German air base.
Wait till this guy finds out helis cant be locked by the radar.
So whats your grand solution to the SPAA imbalance?
1 Like
No, it won’t be. It’s still hugely effective when fired at a standstill in WT and that’s without the additional motor they put on it when fired from the ground.
Then the Pantsir shouldnt have even been added. That’s how balancing works. If you don’t have an SPAA vehicle thats on par for every nation, you don’t add it.
1 Like
Mfw the 2s6 was perfectly fine as a top tier spaa and didnt need to be replaced.
1 Like
Nah it wasnt good enough, totally nobody was using it as a tank destroyer. It was totally just bad.
People call the addition of the Pantsir balanced, but completely think it’d be unfair if the AGM-88 or similar was added lmao.
1 Like
Almost as if repairing a damaged vehicle will always remain slightly worse in performance to the intact and undamaged one.
And lets not even talk about the crew that is dead yet still keeps loading the gun
Don’t think the crew does. Since the reload speed does get reduced when you lose one of your gunners or even all of em.