Literally can count this as American. It’s on an F-15. Japan=Almost always with USA in RB and SB.
Pathetic carrier, J-8F. Might as well not exist
If this were true there would be no problem with US planes against US.
Bruh I’m just ranking based on missile performance. Like we get it red team suffers jfc
1 Like
So you have no answer, and I provided how you dodge ANY missile, but okay.
So chaffing + notching + hiding behind hills + being 10 meters off the ground = ah yes I’m bad lol.
Huh kinda funny, because even the Warthunder YouTube showed what I just described on how to dodge them.
I think your just trolling kid, the Aim-120 is broken as is, somehow tracking through the ground.
Meanwhile, the R-77 is no better than a R-3R
Even so, it’s talking about the missile which is currently tracking through the ground, and is generally operating far better than its counter parts.
Aim-120 = child’s play, too easy, broken, OP
R-77 = bad tracking, poor overload (thought it had like 45g), Russian radars have been terrible since the update, you have a 1/4 hit chance, which is worse than the R-27ER which was about a 1/2.
The pure definition of “I’ve only played America, think my tanks are invincible, and I have no idea how to play”
PLAY ANY OTHER NATION BRO. usa is super hand held if any nation was. You have planes, tanks, and ships that are drastically under Br’d and stomp the competition.
Riddle me this,
The T29: 7.0, M551(76) 7.0
Rus: Is-6 7.7, (closet Rus light tank is the BTR) 7.3
If USA is soooo baddd why are most of your tanks under Br’d?
Notch, dont engage in long range fights knowing you have a range disadvantage
Don’t know what to tell you, dawg.
How high do you think the m551 could go?
Russian planes are poor at BVR due to range disadvantage, so the smart Russian player doesn’t fight at range.
Russian planes are poor at pitbull range since Russian planes have inadequate radars with poor scan rates and 10km ACM range, so the smart Russian player doesn’t fight at pitbull range.
Russian planes are poor at knife fight ranges due to subpar flight models and lack of countermeasure counts to pre-flare frequently, so the smart Russian player doesn’t fight at knife fight ranges.
To maximize his bias, the smart Russian player flies the F-15 instead.
13 Likes
You have somewhat workable 1 circle performance, use that to get an R-73 off. Past that, yeah you’re dead.
Just need to pray that the NATO opponent forgets to use some of his hundreds of flares to pre-flare during your one circle.
2 Likes
NATO planes deploy flares downwards, nobody is Neg-g’ing through your 1-circle, my guy.
Top tier sim is effectively dead for anyone that doesn’t already have thousands of games in it and isn’t playing NATO planes. At any one time there might be one lobby where all of the experienced red side players are congregated into one team and then they can club all of the blue team noobs…but for every lobby like that there are another 3-4 that are just a blue side stomp.
And a lot of the times those good players will leave lobbies before they end or when they die a few times…so the average player shouldn’t really expect to rely on them.
I can just look at my recent USA experience spading the F-16A. It’s the easiest the game has ever been for me. I’m pretty sure I still have 100 percent win rate in the plane and I am touching 90 percent in the F-16C. And it isn’t even just the objective structure…it’s technically possible to assemble a red team squad and win a game on tickets…but the deliberate effort required is in stark contrast to the “turn brain off fire AMRAAM rtb” gameplay that is productive as an American player.
I would straight up not recommend the game mode to anyone that is looking to get into a sim. DCS FC3 modules are far better balanced and offer a better experience for anyone that has a computer that can run it and afford it.
And based on threads like these where a guy who probably speed ran to the F-15C and isn’t going 104-0 in it so he wants to nerf RU tech…yeah I don’t think it’s going to get any better.
5 Likes
It doesn’t matter which way the flares are pointing to disrupt your attempts to get a lock while the 73 is still on the rail. They’re both within the FOV.
2 Likes
Just slave the R-73 to HMD radar. Solves everything.
1 Like
Yup you right, low KD as I spade it. I’m not an air player, I got it for GRB. This way I can avoid the clickbait people more often.
I’m no target audience, I just couldn’t be bothered to grind through shit I didn’t want to bother with any further because i don’t like it. Has nothing to do with your incorrect opinion that gaijin made US stuff overpowered. My time has value, not going to waste my little free time playing something I don’t like.
Your opinion holds no value because you don’t understand how to use your planes.
Even with stock grind taken into account, 0.3 K/D is extremely low.
US air is overpowered, there’s no two ways around it. US have been dominant ever since they introduced the F-14A.
You said your Aim120 don’t hit much, but it’s quite obvious you have no idea about correct launch parameters. I put you in the same bag as every “Aim7F are bad missiles” clowns when I effortlessly shoot down people with the EJ Kai. Heck lately I’ve been grinding the FGR2 with Skyflashes (that SUCKS at anything beyond 10km) and it’s insane the number of missile joust I won against planes with way better performances than mine.
6 Likes
Try not to hurt your hand patting yourself on the back so hard.
Regardless, you can put me in whatever bag you want, you’re not correct, again. I love the 7fs, I do fine with them.
Also this is correct. Upward flare deployment is much better against IRCCM missiles which not a lot of planes have.
2 Likes
Depends on missile maybe?
At least one “guide” on youtube stated that upwards better against fov and down against seeker shutoff