Once again we’re back at decompression discussion. As usual, we’ll be looking at all top tier (Rank VIII) aircraft and their ARB BRs. Yes, I agree there are many other aircraft that need decompressed or just BR changes in general. I have to restrict myself to jsut Rank VIII or else I’d end up changing the BR of nearly every aircraft!
For TL,DR: main decompression points at current 13.0, 13.7, 14.0
11.3
Expand
Tornado IDS MFG
Tornado GR.1, Tornado IDS ASSTA.1, Tornado IDS 1995
Tornado MLU RET.8- unless it receives better missiles which has been stated as a possibility
11.7
Expand
Su-25SM3
12.0
Expand
Kurnass 2000
12.3
Expand
Tornado ADV, Tornado F3
F-4EJ KAI
JA-37D
Harrier GR.7
JF-7A
MiG-21 Bison
Tornado GR.4
Mirage 2000D-R1
12.7
Expand
F-16A
F-20A
Mirage 2000C-S4
F-14A
Netz, Netz
Mirage 2000D-RMV
13.0
Expand
F-16A ADF, ADF, MLU, AJ
MiG-29 9.12A,B, 9.13
Yak-141
13.3
Expand
AV-8B plus, AV-8B Plus, FA.2
MiG-29G
F/A-18A, C Early
F-14A IRAIF, F-14B
F-16A (FR)
JA-37DI, DI
Kfir C.10
13.7
Expand
Tornado F.3 Late
F-4F ICE
J-8F
F-15A, J, Baz
Su-27, J-11, Su-33
Mirage 4000
JAS-39A
14.0
Expand
JF-17
F-16D Barak II
MiG-29SMT
14.3
Expand
Su-34
J-11A
JAS-39C, C, C, C HU
F-16AM, OCU, C, C Barak II
Mirage 2000-5F, 5Ei
14.7
Expand
J-10A
F-15C, J(M), Baz M
Su-27SM
J-11B
F/A-18C, C
15.0
Expand
EF-2000, F-2000A, FGR.4
F-15E,I
Rafale
Su-30SM
Bonus: armament changes
Expand
These are optional loadout changes that could be done to further balance aircraft more effectively. Each bullet point is a group of aircraft that would need changed as a group to remain balanced relative to each other while the group is adjust relative to aircraft outside the group.
- Netz, Netz: remove ahistorical Python 3, to 12.7
More historical while maintaining balance - F-16A: add AIM-9M, to 13.3
Netz, Netz: remove Python 3, add AIM-9M, to 13.3
F-16 ADF (US): add AIM-9M, to 13.7
F-16 ADF (IT), MLU: add AIM-120B, AIM-9M, to 14.3
More historical particularly for the ADF and MLU, while maintaining balance. Moves 4th gen airframes away from 3rd gens while keeping performance via armament. - MiG-29 9.12A,B,G, 9.13: add R-73, remove R-27ER/ET, to 13.3
Much needed historical change plus better balancing for 29G. - Yak-141: add R-73, R-77, to 13.7
Historical change of intended weaponry - MiG-21 Bison: add R-77, to 13.7
Historical change - J-8F: add PL-8B, to 13.7
Historical change and slight buff but not huge - F/A-18C: add AIM-120C-4, to 15.0
Solidifies F/A-18C as BVR missile truck, without overly powerful AIM-120C-5s or later
*F/A-18A add AIM-7P, AIM-9M, to 13.7
F/A-18C Early add AIM-9M, to 13.7
Historical additions and good buff
Closing notes
As usual, I will explain but not defend my decisions. That is, I’ll answer questions for why vehicles were placed where they were but will not engage further. I simply don’t have the time nor energy to argue around in circles with every single person who disagrees.
Yes, there are BR overlaps between rank VIII and VII, and Rank VII vehicles that need rebalancing. But I’ve decided to set a hard line at Rank VIII, because otherwise I’d end up rebalancing almost every vehicle in the game!
New missiles: there’s as always been discussions of “x new missile should be added now”, from the classic demands of AIM-120C-5 and Python 4s, to quieter calls for R-74M and AIM-9X, to newcomers in R-37M an PL-10. And as always people are grossly underestimating the capabilities of such missiles. That’s all I have to say about that.
Aircraft don’t all fly the same. This has two really important effects to remember- not every aircraft can use the same playstyle and not every aircraft can be the best of the BR. Remember these two factors before asking for a lower BR because x plane can’t do y as good as z plane can. Look at the aircraft holistically and used in its best role when considering balance.
Finally, remember, if you think there’s a balancing issue, aim upwards and not downwards. This is about decompression and not compression after all!