What vehicles do you think didn’t exist?
Also btw I’ve never understood people comparing numbers of possible vehicles of one country to vehicles implemented into the game of another country. Compare it to other custom TTs then, here is mine btw (and still not every single vehicle included, plus paper/not completed avoided):
At least you don’t compare overall amount of vehicles, but just uniqueness. Imo some TTs can have more C&P, some less, Switzerland has a lot of interesting vehicles to add for sure.
the R3 T106 was a simple potential option for the turret that could be mounted on the R3 chassis and was never actually mounted or considered by anyone. it only appears on the brochure amounts with a bunch of other potential turrets theoretically possible to mount on the same chassis
the Sidam 25 Mistral was a mock up for a magazine while there was negotiation with France to acquire the Mistral. but those negotiations never came to an export of Mistral to Italy. so all they had was the dream of having Mistral on the Sidam turret.
i also did some work for the Italian. here is an example of a tech tree which is pretty outdated.
every vehicle is a bit higher BR as I included a rebalance for every nation which adds some older vehicles. just ignore almost every vehicle at BR 1.0 to 1.7 and remove a whole BR 1.0 to get the balance of the vehicle. this work is 2 years old so there is elements missing and new information out
there is no paper model and no Hungarian. still, it works fine.
in a year or two there will be the KF41 and KF51 to add there. it would give some additional top tier materials.
I asked @BlueBeta Italian historical consultant if T106 variant was trialed and he confirmed it was (as well as the variant with Folgore turret), unlike the variant with TOW which was only possible option available on request.
Not sure about that one, but iirc it was functional and not just mock-up, though this one questionable anyway since it most likely wasn’t completed to the state we have in the game, with double launchers.
he showed no proof of it and neither one could find it. he was also the one who decided the R3 T20 HS had a stabilizer while there is no mention of it. i asked a dozen times to show the proof. he could never provide it.
all that was shown is this
Definitely a +1 from me, this is one of the better contenders for an independent tech tree proposal, although there might be slight future-proofing problems.
@T50B_BlackEagles btw sorry to tell you, but the leopard 2a4 MLU is no 11.7 material, they are barely 10.7 if anything, the add on armor was never finished and is only sheet metal, as demonstrators how they could look they were never installed
E-100 was abandoned with only the hull built and no turret built. However, it was released in a form equipped with an actually manufactured Maus turret. I believe this is a sufficient explanation.
Counterargument as well.
The african roikat missle spaa. Every part exists gsjin wanted to add it but stopped in the end because it never was put together
Ho 229, Yak-141, Kikka, J7W1, J 29D, BV 238, Me 264, AC IV Thunderbolt, TOG, Lago, M6A2E1, VDAA SANTAL, and Radkampfwagen 90 are all vehicles that weren’t fully completed as they are shown in-game despite parts of them being built. That’s without even mentioning things like the F-16J, Bf 109Z, Ho-Ri Production, Chi-To Production, and Chi-Nu II that are straight up paper. There is absolutely no reason that 2A4 MLU couldn’t be added on the same basis
