Yes, though I think people who learn to shoot Commander + Gunner + Breech would have a better reaction time in these scenarios than just those that go for the breech. There’s just more places for them to aim with the former.
1 Like
I keep failing to understand the point made by those not in favor of the proposed change
If bushes don’t have any impact on gameplay as they like to remind us every now and then, then they should be removable in the graphics for anybody without issue ?
Wouldn’t change a thing for those having bushes and make anyone who don’t like seeing them in battle happy.
Seems like an easy win to me
3 Likes
That’s true, just tried to say that breech is a common, predetermined spot to snap to for many people, so your bushed up tank won’t change much in the way how they operate. Bushes are helpful in many scenarios, of which I personally think the biggest benefit comes if you can break up the shape of the tank itself.
1 Like
People have to pay for bushes. If they can be turned off, then no one buys them. That means the snail doesn’t get fed, and the snail gets angry when it’s hungry. Also bushes are good for hiding weak points such as the machine gun port on the jumbo
4 Likes
Today had so much fun, Su-100P racecar parked in the open. The thing is - all i could see was a bush. Before I realised this bush shouldn’t be there, I was dead. Next battle, hulldown T-34-85 300m away, among trees. Most of the turret would be visible. But all that was visible were bushes. Again, I failed to realise bushes are not supposed to be there, dead.
It’s basically A TON more taxing to try to spot a bushed-up pay2winner compared to rest of the players. The difference is insane.
4 Likes
2 Likes
I think this game has more issues regarding unfair gameplay than bushes to be honest.
Pay2win vehicles and super-important vehicles behind ridiculous paywal,l (PaK Puma), Plywood Bug 2.0, horrible game design overal, no skill based matchmaking etc There’s a lot more. But here we discuss pay2win bushes.
we can just add the slope limit from the firework mortar on bushes
If bushes provide no bonus effects and are merely used because they are realitic then this would make it more realitics by not allowing perpenticular bushes.
Surely no mayor differences are felt.
3 Likes
How about we add cosmetic kits, like the camo nets on the newer premium vehicles, to all ground vehicles as researchable modification? (Perhaps with some variations depending on scenarios, etc)
Here to remind everyone the “pay to win bushes” actually do block Thermals, how could that be pay to win?
1 Like
Its funny how bush warriors come up with these
- “SucAKS YoU CATnT BuTY ItT”. I could have bought 50 bushes amount of money I spent on premium. I just dont wanna be some p2w abuser thats just it.
- “You can take them of by shooting” Like how absurd this claim is. I could just shoot its weak point WITH JUST one shot. Definitely FOR THAT REASON THEY SHOULD BE IN THE GAME RIGHT.
- “They are cosmetic and historic” WOW nice historic, COSMETIC feature thats why you BUY put em on your tank right?
- “Let people turn them off who cares. Whining about bushes is still silly.” THATS WHAT WE WANT AND CANT HAVE YOU KNOW. And lets let newcomers face with guy that has 500 bushes, 10k matches on BR1 OP vehicle; a newcomer who learned how to look weakspots face with Fully bushed Jumbo, KV1. They should waste their moment with machine gunning bushes. Thats why he is playing the game, for sure.
- “You can grind them its not P2W.” I don’t want them for free either I just dont wanna see bushes. Its A BAD THING TO HAVE IN A GAME.
only guys like him defends this thing. I have contributed a lotta penny to the game. Like its not the point???