Yes, though I think people who learn to shoot Commander + Gunner + Breech would have a better reaction time in these scenarios than just those that go for the breech. There’s just more places for them to aim with the former.
1 Like
I keep failing to understand the point made by those not in favor of the proposed change
If bushes don’t have any impact on gameplay as they like to remind us every now and then, then they should be removable in the graphics for anybody without issue ?
Wouldn’t change a thing for those having bushes and make anyone who don’t like seeing them in battle happy.
Seems like an easy win to me
2 Likes
That’s true, just tried to say that breech is a common, predetermined spot to snap to for many people, so your bushed up tank won’t change much in the way how they operate. Bushes are helpful in many scenarios, of which I personally think the biggest benefit comes if you can break up the shape of the tank itself.
1 Like
People have to pay for bushes. If they can be turned off, then no one buys them. That means the snail doesn’t get fed, and the snail gets angry when it’s hungry. Also bushes are good for hiding weak points such as the machine gun port on the jumbo
2 Likes
Today had so much fun, Su-100P racecar parked in the open. The thing is - all i could see was a bush. Before I realised this bush shouldn’t be there, I was dead. Next battle, hulldown T-34-85 300m away, among trees. Most of the turret would be visible. But all that was visible were bushes. Again, I failed to realise bushes are not supposed to be there, dead.
It’s basically A TON more taxing to try to spot a bushed-up pay2winner compared to rest of the players. The difference is insane.
2 Likes
1 Like
I think this game has more issues regarding unfair gameplay than bushes to be honest.
Pay2win vehicles and super-important vehicles behind ridiculous paywal,l (PaK Puma), Plywood Bug 2.0, horrible game design overal, no skill based matchmaking etc There’s a lot more. But here we discuss pay2win bushes.