That’s just how the flavour of the month system works though.
Every once in a while Sweden, USA, Germany and Russia take turns dominating the rest after they receive a fancy new toy. Large numbers of players then flock to the FOTM nation as a result.
The fact that the M1A1 might just be the #1 strongest MBT in the entire game relative to it’s BR might have something to do with that as well.
I assume if I point out the fact that Russia at 10.0 has had negative winrates for around 4 years in a row now, you’d tell me it’s because of poor players using strong vehicles.
But you wouldn’t use the same argument for US vehicles, even though it’s extremely clear that the terrible players are the root cause of the issue here.
Ariete’s have nearly double the performance stats of M1A2 players, all whilst the M1A2 is a MASSIVELY superior vehicle in virtually every single category. The same applies to T-72B3’s, T-80U’s, Challenger 2’s, Merkava’s, Leclerc’s, and plenty of other vehicles which aren’t as good as the M1’s are.
Not even counting the fact that a good chunk of top tier maps have had almost all of their flanking routes removed, just take the new sands of sinai map for example, its just two open fields now.
I have yet to see any actual tangible proof for this being the case. People here said the same about the SEP and SEP V2, and how did both of those tanks turn out? As heavier copies of the existing 1986 M1A2 with their only improvement being the gun sight thermals going up a generation.
u don’t clearly understand WT Matchmaking, Italy is mostly with Russia-Germany-Sweden (99% the winning team) that’s why, USA most of the time play with israel,UK, and they face tanks that are obviously way more protected, that’s why u see some nations with higher winrate and others with less winrate.
+The problem with USA winrates is clearly a lack of armor, abrams being added with several versions of it but no add-on armor that will improve its survivability, and adding the SEP V2 didn’t do anything its just another fat abrams with antennat that say Hi! I’m here, shoot me right now!
Well compared to the Sep1/2, the SepV3 did have known armor improvements. For the SepV1/2, a lot of people assumed that they have have considerable improvement but majority of the known improvements where the electronics the the arat, not the armor.
As of now there is no evidence of this being the case bar pixel hunting on the turret arrays which is not a valid source for gaijin.
General Dynamics quoted that both the SEP and SEP V2 both had full spectrum protection improvements, the same exact statements have been made about the SEP V3 in their marketing materials. These documents also also not considered valid sources for gaijin.
As of now, there is nothing that can cross gaijin’s burden of proof for the SEP V3 to prove it has improved armor.
you mean how Gaijin copied and pasted the whole abrams tree? and how the ADATS can’t even kill a fly, and let’s not talk about how the 2s38 can penetrate Abrams from every side and front. I honestly want every nation to have equivalent armor, but if u comparing USA with other nations it’s clearly a dumb idea tbh, all NATO suffer, but mostly its US.
why people keep comparing US with other nations? it’s fk up how a major country with the most upgraded and well proved tanks-jets-subs-aircraft carriers get compared to country known for tourism, wat r u on son.
and my point is it’s the same exact armor from the previous tanks, i don’t care about Italy, the topic mentions US why would u bring Italy here, do u carry it in your pocket or is it like a card u pull whenever US main claim that their tank extremely lacks armor.
