“Buddy, the statistical performance of the planes does not reflect the actual performance of the planes, math is just numbers, and reality is fake”
5 Likes
funny hearing that coming from the guy that claims all of that
he actually called 530F OP lmao
1 Like
It’s really funny how the forum lets him insult me but if I point out his statistics he gets to flag my posts :) (This will also be flagged)
2 Likes
he likes to ragebait
Normandy likes ragebaiting himself XD
shut yo trap mirageless
2 Likes
Lol. Just because you agree with one of his views doesn’t mean you needa defend him. Ngl, it was clear he was clinically insane long, long ago.
His takes on the F-5 especially will tank your faith in humanity.
yeah i think people who think that a pulse missile at 12.0 is OP are clinically insane
i don’t take any mental health advice from mirageless losers anyway
3 Likes
self awareness, or just you being silly?
hope that clears up my silliness allegations
I don’t recall anyone calling it OP, so it seems like you’re just getting twisted in your sea of lies. All I said was it’s seemingly immune to all normal forms of countermeasures (notch + multipath or chaff) it also doesn’t spark RWR (I’m not the only one to notice either).
Sadly, you’re simply too biased to realize your favorite prem is OP.
you probably felt really cool and witty while thinking of that reply
i dont have the premium version
2 Likes
Buddy, most people don’t think of highly of themselves as you.
Literally does not matter. People like defending OP vehicles. Just look under BMPT threads.
well i dropped spading the F1 because it feels like complete and utter ASS to play, im not really defending it, just saying you are a silly billy
yes please bow before me
1 Like
That is incredible skill issue. Like genuinely that’s even worse than the BMPT threads ffs.
come back at me when you play the thing you are so hellbent on nerfing
2 good IR missiles really cant make a shit plane good
Bad player can’t make Magic 2s good aparently.
call me bad all you want, wont change a thing
you have never used this plane, you have never used magics, you never had to deal with a 4 segment RWR at 12.0, you never had to use a pulse SARH at 12.0
your opinion is based on pure theory
1 Like
XD you cannot say Mirage F1C is bad, then tell someone else their opinion is pure theory.
You’re like a parody of the stereotypical American main.
The F-5’s nonsense damage model and heat signature are well known in the community. Here’s a link to a video where someone actually tested the heat signature empirically.
Spoiler alert, despite having the exact same engines in the exact same placement on the exact same throttle setting, the G/91 YS can be easily locked from over 3km away, while the F-5A/C cannot.
Not sure if this extends to the F-5E, but he can be forgiven for assuming the meme-worthy handholding of two F-5 models extends to a third.
The damage model is harder to empirically prove, but anyone with first hand experience fighting the F-5s can easily tell you of times where the F-5 just shrugged off battle damage that would have outright killed any other plane. I squaded by with a buddy of mine that had an F-5C, and when spectating him I was shocked at the amount of punishment it took to take him down. Here’s an example clip from the same video.
That’s not going into the fictional flares, missiles, etc.
2 Likes