So i laughed out loud when i saw a request to balance towards the majority. It is the same like lowering recruiting standards for Armed Forces - it simply weakens the combat effectiveness in a battle - and in wt it prevents the need to improve.
Right… gotta love comparing entering the literal military to a video game.
WT has to appeal to the majority of its playerbase, its as simple as that.
favorite cc on yt (DEFYN) uses mouse aim and instructor.
And this is bad… why? If you dont want mouse aim, thats what sim is for.
That is funny. I consider air RB waaaay more relaxing then air AB. In RB, you can take off, make a coffee, and come back, and aside from runway sacrifices, nothing has happened yet.
1 Like
have fun with the 5 minute games for the foreseeable future!
1 Like
You cannot have one or the other. To improve the game would involve removing the gamemode and replacing it entirely. Since the mode by functionality has prioritized fighters as the centric. With bombers and other vessels to the sidelines. The issue is, it should be the opposite. Bombers and other vehicles should take priority over fighters. This means you would be telling people to defend the bombers. Then go do their own thing aka fight other fighters.
1 Like
Or how about you actually address the points I brought up…?
Yeah, I dont play air RB- I find it boring af, and climbing for 10m at the start doesnt interest me. However, that doesnt mean I cant point out blindingly obvious issues with your logic, nor does it mean I cant offer my opinion on these things.
2 Likes
A discussion requires the willingness to understand others and their opinions - and an honest interest in deviating opinions. And opinions are except things like faith (or religion in general) based on facts gained by actual knowledge - everything else are believes.
So in the best case both parties benefit by listening to (deviating) fact based opinions - as seeing certain topics from different angles is actually interesting if the other party is able to present them in a proper manner.
The goal of a discussion is not to determine who is right or wrong. The goal is to identify underlying motivations which created deviating opinions and the underlying facts which support them. So in a best case both parties reflect their own positions and might revise their pov on their own.
It makes zero sense to discuss anything with people which have just a fact-free opinion and lack any experience or actual knowledge about the topics they are talking about.
I asked you to understand my reluctance to continue with our exchanges and you still feel the need to continue. So i execute my right to ignore others if i see no benefit for me. Quite simple.
sigh
That is your right, still seems rather dumb to me, especially since it came just as I started to actually question your points.
as seeing certain topics from different angles is actually interesting if the other party is able to present them in a proper manner.
ah, so my perspective as an AB player isnt a valid angle to offer my opinions on, got it… even though the reason I dont play rb air is bc of how it is currently, and I want it to be made better so I will play it
Like damn, can you just set aside the person for a second and think about what they are saying first?
2 Likes