Su 17M2, F-4F early (ger) and F-4C should’ve been not touched because of their special status of being 10.0+ br without any countermeasures to compete with other jets that carry either all-aspect 30g missiles or rear aspect 20g missiles, knowing the F8U is at 10.0 with flares and decent missiles why shouldn’t those 3 jets as I said be either 10.3 or 10.0?
I agree, plus a lot of the Strike aircraft around 10.0-11.0 are just waaaaay too high in BR. There’s no way the F-111A should be higher than 10.0.
You know other jets without flares sat at higher BR’s then they did for years right?
I mean the vehicels sit at a BR where you can spaceclilb and dive down onto a base. I played the su 17m2 and yes it was annoying because of facing aim9l but aim9ls are the only problem imo because of the long burntime. All these planes are kinda fast and can climb high (in a down tier) or sneak around and be below multipath. But I can’t say anything against a BR decreas of thise planes because all aspect missiles are undodgable in really close range. And the F8u is just criminal but it will get a BR increas in the next BR changes (hopefully)
All 3 are rank VII, F8U is rank VI. Only rank VII went up in BR.
All 3 are faster than F8U.
Give this bunch of braindead basebombing Milans, SU7, A10, Su25, Harriers/AV8 one more braincell and the success of the F8U will change drastically.
I guess F8U will go up in BR soon not because of it’s strength, it’s more about the weird matchmaker and the bunch of dumb enemy players. If this happens you will read many threads in this forum about it. ;-)
Put this 3 planes at 10.0 and the players will whining about every Mig19 rins their asses.
And 10.0 doesn’t solve the problem of All Aspect Missiles.
I know and they fixed it already it’s the time to change the topic or you dindn’t notice
F-5C went up from rank VI to rank VII so the same I suppose would happen to the F8U, it’s just an excelent grinder for 10.0, flares,20g missiles and decent/good performance it would sit perfectly either at 10.3 or 10.7