So I’m sure that the Aim-120A is going to be added onto a few top tier fighters but what about strike aircraft?
The AV-8B Plus has the full capability to have Aim-120s mounted and launched from the aircraft due to it having F/A-18 radar.
What do you all think about this and would you want this added or not?
I have a feeling if they decided to give AMRAAMS to lesser performing air frames first it would explain why the Americans haven’t go their AV8B + yet so i think it should get it when it comes
In essence, it would probably end up at the same BR as the Sea Harrier FA2. Though would need slightly better A2G kit to compensate. Maybe a gen 3 T-pod
Even then though getting a downtier in that BR is so slim. But 12.0 wouldn’t be bad for it, i play it a lot in ASB and ARB and its not that bad fighting F-16s and such, just got to know when to launch your missiles.
FA2 holds the advantage with the much better radar and I think volume of missiles… (i cant recall if AV-8B+ can run 4x Aim-9M and 2x AMRAAM like the FA2 can. Or if its 2x Aim-9M and 2x AMRAAM)
Av-8B+ holds the advantage with turn performance and A2G loadout, as well as CM count.
I think radar though will be the greatest advantage though. Blue Vixen is kinda insane in performance, and with the main weapon likely being the AMRAAM, that might be worth the disadvantages/
Ah yep, so if its wing tips then they would have the same max AAM count then, ( though AV-8B+ could maintain 2x IR whilst running 4x AMRAAM, FA2 couldnt do that)
Assumed it did, in the same config as the Gr7. Never actually looked at the Italian one and it doesnt. So in that case, With BOL, FA2 would have the CM count advantage, with twin mounts the AV-8B+ would have the CM count advantage