AH-64E Bugs, suggestions, feedback

Yes, it’s that way for every IIR AGM, and it has no practical relevance for any of them. The kneecapped POINT lock range of 10 km for the JAGM-MR does, but I haven’t seen anyone complain about that yet.

hey guys they decided to make the ah64e look ugly now so please put you have the same issue here.

[DEV] AH-64E Overly Weathered // Gaijin.net // Issues

@N8AHbl4 You should add this.

I put ”i have the same issue” but could you show me before snd after so i can get a better understanding of ehat the difference is (I want the heli to look new and fresh btw)

I did the first picture was before and the one with blue circles is after take a look at the color diff too

1 Like

uhhhhhhhhhh
its not like weathering is a bad thing, its just that textures in the game are universally very ass and low effort


Made a topic about the separation of JAGMs into two different missiles, feel free to share your opinions

1 Like

Ive already said what i think, and I completely agree with you

something like the HE/PF mode selector on the M106 and similar rounds

here are bug reports for 16x AGM-179 (SAL)
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/hOxGsv8IBO0P
and one for HEAT APKWS made in response to Z10 getting fire snake missiles
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/ywl3cVpqrO9h

I’m not sure if people have mentioned it but the IR JAGM doesn’t lock anywhere near the 20km or even 16km like it says on the statcard, not to mention it isn’t even able to hit a target 10km away even though it should be able to reach that 16km

3 Likes

At the very least the A10C should get some Jagms too

Didn’t it test brimstone’s? That might be what those are since it’s a triple rack

Report said they were Jagms, could be wrong though.

Lockheed says that the JAGM-F are compatible with these aircraft

Stat card for the JAGM-MR states

{7918F890-8B0C-45EF-BB3F-865569B23912}

There would be no reason for them to be incompatible with fighters since they are already compatible with the JAGM-F

Pretty much any aircraft using the BRU-61/A, aka the rack for GBU-39s, can use the JAGM-F as they are both designed to be launched from the BRU-61/A.

AKA, whatever load of GBU-39s a aircraft can carry, it can carry that many JAGM-Fs.

1 Like

Nice catch, here’s the F-15 sporting them

2 Likes

thats because hellfires are giga gimped ingame, thats not what the comparator should be.

can mi28 carry a full loadout of lmur then? id rather have 4/5 lmurs at that point, they arent HEAT jank

kh38mt doesnt exist, JAGM-MR is just a new very weapon. VERY different.

And considering how bad hellfires 2 are ingame you should probably shut up lol, especially when vikhrs were always the opposite.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=racYldYcpK8.

3 Likes

8 is clearly the number Gaijin decided to go for in terms of max amount of F&F ATGMs on all attack helis except for the AH-60. A full loadout of LMURs happens to be 8.

wait 8? is that even realistic for LMURs? i dont think ive seen a russian heli ever carry more than 4,

lol russian helis will be top again i guess.