Oh, also, on a not ground forces note, the P-51 mustang and F4-U would face the Me 262 A1-a
I enjoy the atgm one. Never played the spaa one
Oh, and the regular F-86 Sabre would face the J32B with AIM-9B’s and an afterburning engine.
1 Like
Last I recall the only way we managed to get rid of Me-262s and Me-163s was thanks to them getting ready to land but were still far from hostile Self-propelled anti-air and flak guns. Otherwise this was the only way you effectively could. Unless you bombed the airstrip.
1 Like
You think the USA didn’t face Tiger 2 with 75mm Shermans? We have plenty of mismatches throughout the game. The M22 is probably on par with nothing tank wise in its own BR but you can kill a Panther in it.
Nothing on the ground will counter a 5000 pound bomb dropped from height so we have to face the thing we cannot kill in WT so your point is moot really.
The idea of era imbalance is becoming more pronounced as Gaijin spammed 6BR with cold war artillery and the 3-4 BR is currently spammed with the SAV 20.12.48 which never saw service at any point. Nice if you have it, a game killer if you dont.
I could not make the OP work but I agree with it in principle, and I think Gaijin should have a think about the effects of new vehicles on the game before they roll them out.
Oh yeah, not like there’s 8-9 other BR’s you can play without seeing the thing. And that’s beside the question anyway, the game won’t see historical match making, they tried it at one time, and you see where we are now.
Your point is what there? You agree with me then? I should move BR to avoid one fantasy vehicle that never saw a days action in reality?
Don’t worry Mr Halo forgets that fighters and twin engines can intercept bombers, Self Propelled Anti Air and the occasional Flak gun can blow up the bomb before it even falls.
Probably doesn’t recall the SAV autoloader being an open top and weak to pretty much everything that isn’t a 7.62 and typically the experienced players are the ones using it to great effect while the not as experienced are well not good at using it.
Well, seeing as it has 1.2 second reload, decent mobility, and 0 effective armor, it’s placed fairly well, but would probably even fit in near 5.0 with the Delat Torn.
Was it really called that? I guess its same story for T-90 (T-72BU) then.
I know M26 was designated a heavy tank firstly, but I didnt know that completely.
Yep. The E2 was redesignated to the M46 due to it being so majorly different compared to the original since most of the original components to its engine probably even tracks were vastly different so it wasn’t compatible with the old parts.
1 Like
Oh yeah, Chinese T-34-85’s would face M26’s.
1948.That is what 3 years of development brings you . Who else had that in WW2 and who else has it in game? You are hit so fast that you can do nothing in the game now except go buy one yourself. Along you come and defend that, well done Gaijin boy lol
As history shown in the Korean War T-34/85’s were just not effective against the Pershings and most certainly the M46.
1 Like
This is such a bad idea because its already bad on paper if we consider start of production/acception/first model being made date, and its even worse when you consider time periods being used.
Just imagine having to fight something like A-545 with Mosin just because these two are used in same time periods (Mosin being the old grandpa here).
And completely ignore the blaring fact I said it could be pushed up to the Delat Torn. (5.0)*
So now everybody bought it at 3.7 Gajin take the money and jack it up to 4.7 lol and you approve, you really are a Gaijin employee :) Thanks for the money clowns, your 3.7 wonder weapon is now no longer the vehicle you bought in good faith but a now relatively useless 4.7 waste of cash.
The only way they would ever be if they recieved HEAT-FS from soviets ( which I am not sure they could use or it might wasnt even a thing), or APDS for 85 which only was for 2S14 from 70s and 80s, thats how far you have to stretch it to give them a chance. (I know theres 245 MM pen APHE but I am not sure if it can be used in T-34-85)
Theres also rocket boosted APDS which is chinese design but never went anywhere from prototypes and test firings.
When John Halo and Wishie MC Wish assume we like Gaijin and that’s why we are stating this idea is bad.
Okay, so your being two faced, like a little PoS, go ahead, idgas, seems like you don’t really want to be helpful here. I watched a video of it being pushed not to 5.0, but 5.7, and still proforming like an absolute monster. Just go ahead and try to align me with Gaijin, I agree with none of their business model, and am mostly F2P, with the exception of collecting some premiums.