ADATS, what Gaijin got wrong

Maybe, but what i hope is that they stop comparing everything to OSA
image
And realize radars were capable of higher elevations coverages, even when they look simmilar.

5 Likes

From “WA483 911 System Description”
image001
image002

Got the annex too @DevilO6

With TWS, this would be able to defend from a lot of agms.

2 Likes

These are the same pictures, or am I missing something?

Same pictures, just added them and said the annex so it would make sense for which it would be

3 Likes

Why did they remove neutral steering? Wasn’t the platform the Bradley?

Edit:

Not sure what a modified chassis entails. Maybe due to weight constraints, having neutral steering would be maintenance nightmare or something?

1 Like

image

Where did you see they got rid of neutral steering?

Someone pointed it out on the datamine discord yesterday, though I can’t find it in the actual list.
image

I did try it out this morning and it does look like it got removed

1 Like

Stealth nerf? Was this dev they removed it or live?

Sorry, should’ve clarified, this is in the dev server

Looks like it’s not intentional.

2 Likes

https://www.reddit.com/r/Warthunder/comments/1j84voy/244031_244036_part_2/

3 Likes

Thank you!

Would these changes be intentional in your opinion or could they have been accidental?

There’s a good chance of it going to live regardless (looking at the VBCI)

I’ll make a recording then submit a bug report when I get home. To see if any action comes of it.

There is no way to tell that from code alone.

yeah like what other code related to adats neutral steer
its prolly stealth nerf

Nothing? I don’t really understand the question.

How can it be stealth if I documented it through datamine?
If you mean how it’s not in Gaijin changelogs: They don’t have every change, never have, never will.