I dont , its just using prerequisite knowledge of assuming if there was such a use case , as technecially it can fire m919 , justs that we would never know if it got given any in its testing or prototype stages or even on paper
We won’t be able to access to any of those unless someone actively wants to declassify them. I still have hope the Dr. will be able to make more available
ADATS radar coverage incorrect
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/TD1UFYLo3GhE
@condor777645-psn
I think the only better thing than TWS would be this
I still dont know how they will bite the radar, but as can be seen on the diagram
At the most extreme point that radar reaches -10 to 72. I expect them to do make it smaller tho
Ik but adding like 10 or even 5 degrees to current value would be veeery helpful
Oh no. The LEAST they should give it is 55, as that is primary area of interest, so it goes at least from 0-18 to 0-55. They should give it -10-72 in order to be consistent, but who knows.
That would be actually huge buff. I wonder if they would bump br back to 12.0 cuz of this
Maybe, but what i hope is that they stop comparing everything to OSA
And realize radars were capable of higher elevations coverages, even when they look simmilar.
With TWS, this would be able to defend from a lot of agms.
These are the same pictures, or am I missing something?
Same pictures, just added them and said the annex so it would make sense for which it would be
Why did they remove neutral steering? Wasn’t the platform the Bradley?
Edit:
Not sure what a modified chassis entails. Maybe due to weight constraints, having neutral steering would be maintenance nightmare or something?
Where did you see they got rid of neutral steering?
Someone pointed it out on the datamine discord yesterday, though I can’t find it in the actual list.
I did try it out this morning and it does look like it got removed
Stealth nerf? Was this dev they removed it or live?
Sorry, should’ve clarified, this is in the dev server
Looks like it’s not intentional.