Stock grinding the M1A2T is not better than playing a fully spaded US M1A2 lol.
But stock grinding both…
Ofc they give the Chinese Abrams the better round lol.
I was using your own logic against you.
You said that the stats aren’t accurate because the US M1A2s have been in game for a longer time now, however if we go with that same logic the stats of the US M1A2s should actually be higher than those of the M1A2T.
6 Likes
I dont think they are ok at all bro
1 Like
i mean many pros use it so
Something being identical [copy-paste] requires the research team to determine that it’s identical, and for a 3D model to be copied… then pasted.
These 3 models are not copy-pasted, they are entirely unique to each other.
In the world of 3D modeling, something being copy-paste has a very specific meaning that’s even in dictionaries.
Calling M1A2T “copy-paste” is no different to calling M1A2s “copy-paste” of M1A1.
And obfuscating the term “copy-paste” down to “mechanics”, you suddenly get M1A1 and Leclerc being “copy-paste” because they’re 95% similar in gameplay firing similar rounds with similar mobility and armor.
Just use the definitions that make sense.
And if you want to say they’re similar, just say that they’re similar.
1 Like
Not to mention the m1a2t has different ammo than the us m1a2s
1 Like
Ah yes, implement america bias in order to battle the skill issue.
You do realize that russia is next on the buffing block afterwards? What will you do then? Scream “russian bias”?
Apparently russia hasn’t been buffed enough. Gosh when was the last time abrams got something good hmmmmm.
when it got non US main players to show that its not a bad tank at all
1 Like
SEP V2 can now remove it’s ERA and it just got more smoke and a Laser Warning System
6 Likes
in terms of model buffs. Both russia and USA are beginner nations with bad players. Abrams missing turret ring, breach trunnion, turret basket nerf, something about du armor but Im not sure about validity of that source, and the works. Russia has a trunnion, autoloader does not create spall, shooting ammo in carousel is rng sometimes work sometimes not, shooting the carousel also allows tseries to turn their turret and finish off someone. Sure it has a long repair time but I would take that any day then not being able to turn my turret and my loader always dead. And also amazing spall liners and fuel tanks for the t-series but somehow those don’t work for NATO MBTs as the turret basket creates spall? If that’s true man why did western tank designers not put spall liners in the turret basket too. Tanks like T90 already had LWS so good on Gaijin for that.
shush! Let the american-main cry over his percieved grievences. It’s a coping mechanism.
Remove the Clickbait and Kate pack for a better Abrams, the disparity between the Chinese Abrams and American one is the fact that China is not dragged down by the hordes of 1 ODL premiums that bring the statistics down.
Ok sure, yes. This is true. However that doesn’t necessarily make Russia that much better than American tanks. I will say that if a player has the opportunity to use both genres of tank, assuming with equal level opponents, that player generally does better on American tanks. There is something to be said about the survivability of an Abrams tank, in that it takes more than 2 shots usually to finish it off, as well as the fact that if you DO get shot, a good portion of the time you an reverse off and repair yourself. When you position and fight correctly, the US tank will maintain a higher KDR, as when it gets pressed (and any tank after long enough time will get pressed) into a corner, it has the opportunity to back away, where as a Soviet tank does not. This is coming from experience with both parties, and actually a heavier set of Experience on the US side then Soviet side.
I’m not saying the US doesn’t have issues. It does. And Russia absolutely has some small weird buffs that it should not get. But at the end of the day, and I cannot believe I am saying this after so much complaining about how bad the Abrams is, pure and raw statistics show that the Abrams performs as well if not better.
2 Likes
M829A2, LWS, DU turret armor, blow out panels, got into the game 2+ years earlier than everyone elses’ equivalents.
The Soviet autoloader is a skeleton on the tanks with mobility, and is irrelevant if I hit the ammo with my projectile instead of relying on fragments that don’t do a lot of damage to ammo in-general:
This is 122mm APHE barely damaging Conqueror’s ammo… it’s not just Soviet two piece ammo [I have no test for single piece ammo at this time].
Um… those vehicles don’t impact the stats of other Abrams…
The SEPv2 got a pretty nice small buff in the december update, so not even a month ago?
None of the Abrams tanks got into the game 2+ year before their equivalents.
The M1 and IPM1 were the only ones being added before other equivalents. However it took Gaijin 3-6 months to start adding M1 counterparts and the IPM1 was superseeded after 6 months.
(3-6 months of dominance is still too long, but not 2+ years).
A round that it never even used, just because it is compatible with it, it got it