Cant u hear the voice of us? We just want the VT5 to be real!
【央视7套拍的VT-5坦克介绍片段-哔哩哔哩】 VT-5(2)_哔哩哔哩_bilibili
The accurate loading time for the VT-5 tank is 3.8 seconds,not 5 seconds.The loading time for Japan’s Type 90 and Type 10 tanks is 4 seconds because it really is 4 seconds.The loading time for the VT-5 tank is 5 seconds because it really is 3.8 seconds.When I talk about historical facts,you talk about balance.When I talk about balance,you talk about historical facts.This kind of double standard should not be used.It is very detrimental to players’enthusiasm.
It’s still worth checking out. Just don’t bother above challenger 1.
“On Gaijin’s ‘Historical Accuracy’ for VT5: A Masterclass in ‘Balancing Artistry’”
Ah, esteemed Gaijin overlords, it warms the heart to witness your signature craftsmanship in blending “historical authenticity” with “game balance” for the VT5 light tank—just as it prepares to exit the tech tree. As a humble player in awe of your “rigorous scholarship,” I must kneel before this masterpiece. Who better than our Russian friends to lecture the world on the true capabilities of Chinese military hardware?
-
Gun Depression/Elevation: “Newton Weeps, Chinese Engineers Facepalm”
Your “precision adjustments” to the VT5’s gun angles are nothing short of revolutionary. Reducing its real-world -6°/+22° elevation to a comical -4°/+15°? Brilliant! Suddenly, this 2016-era modern light tank operates with 19th-century lever-operated artillery mechanics. And when players dared question this, your invocation of “classified documents requiring balance” was chef’s kiss—though these files likely share the same quantum superposition state as the infamous Challenger 2 “leaked manuals.”
Armor Protection: “Deconstructing Magical Armor”
Your treatment of the VT5’s composite armor is pure avant-garde. By simplifying its layered defenses into homogenized steel equivalence, you’ve ensured that even a T-34/85’s 76mm cannon can pierce what should be 30mm-proof all-around protection. And let’s not forget the basket area—transformed from equipment-cluttered reality into a pristine “absolute weak spot.” This philosophy of “existence is vulnerability” deserves a Nobel in imaginary anatomy. -
Ammo Racks: “Schrödinger’s Detonation Theory”
Your “probabilistic ammo detonation system” reaches new heights with the VT5. Despite its rear-mounted autoloader, you’ve decreed that its hull ammo racks must explode first. When confronted with real-world blast door data, your reply—“diverse gameplay experiences”—was inspired. Forcing modern armor into WWII-tier mechanics? A stroke of genius, rivaled only by giving the P-51 Mustang F-22 aerodynamics.
Pre-Retirement “Balance Hospice Care”
The pièce de résistance? Timing these “adjustments” to coincide with VT5’s tech tree removal and the debut of a shiny new premium vehicle. This “mourn the old, celebrate the new” cadence is capitalist-historical-nihilism at its finest. It echoes your Challenger-2-era wisdom: “Player-submitted real data? Illegal leaks! We’ll trust our yellowed flea-market pamphlets instead.”
Epilogue: Saluting the “Church of Balance”
In Gaijin’s alternate universe, Newton’s laws bow to spreadsheet balancing, and steel beasts serve profit margins. Such clay-sculpting of reality calls to mind a certain Russian maxim: “If truth harms the payout, truth must perish.” Next patch, why not give the VT5 sails? Nothing says “historical reverence” like balancing 21st-century tech with 19th-century innovation. Спасибо за гениальность! 🎭
Thanks for the advice! :D
Why must Chinese players accept inferior fictional parameters, while Western/Russian vehicles simultaneously enjoy historically accurate or even superior fictional data? We demand a clear explanation from Gaijin, not another round of dismissive template responses.
【央视7套拍的VT-5坦克介绍片段-哔哩哔哩】 VT-5(2)_哔哩哔哩_bilibili
In the 12th second of this official video, we are shown the automatic loading of the VT5, which is obviously faster than 5 seconds. In fact, the automatic loading time of the vt5 is about 3.8 seconds. As a military simulation game, please use as accurate data as possible, not so-called balance.
This situation has been going on for a very long time without any improvement.
The ISSUES administrators must provide more convincing reasons to persuade the players. Our suggestions are always dismissed by management, even when substantial evidence is provided.
I really like the Challenger 2. The UK is the country I’ve spent the most money on in-game, but it’s frustrating that Gaijin has made the Challenger tanks so unacceptably underpowered in War Thunder. The current state of the British tech tree in the game is infuriating—it completely fails to reflect the actual combat capabilities of British tanks.
Unfortunately,They don’t want to see the truth; they only want to see the truth they want to see.
And the Chinese game is only better than the UK, also in the game to be officially made the finished product is unacceptable, the Soviet Union is the first country I finished, and then my main energy to play the British and Chinese games. I spent a lot of money in both departments, but both countries were weak in the game
EXACTLY. If Gaijin continues to ignore one of the largest player bases in the game, especially with such blatant unfair treatment and double standards in place, they will ultimately face the consequences, Which I believe neither gaijin nor us would wish to see.
We’ve provided Gaijin tons of data, for goodness’ sake what do we get in return? A glorified tin-can whose lower front plate can still be penetrated by 12.7mm rounds in 2025???You expect us to believe this represents proper armor protection for a 30-ton vehicle???
True, friend. None would spend any for a vehicle which proved bvvd still do nothing for better but only prejudice and discrimination. He have a way that could succeed all.
But why? Why he won’t.
I think this is the most complex and perfect issue I have made.
VT-5 should have more armor(OSINT and multiple secondary source) // Gaijin.net // Issues
This issue has been deleted.
VT4 and ZTZ99As issuse still dont sovle,therefore we dont want our new vechiel VT5 be disabled!
your issue is hidden
maybe you can let other players upload the issue