“How isn’t it” is generally accepted as a contradictory statement in english, there is no implied reason for it to mean anything other then as normally assumed.
I should not have to explain English to someone on this forum but here goes:
The context of what I was directly replying to, user says "AAm3 “is not rly 40g”
I say: “How isn’t it?” which means I am asking him “how is the AAM3 not a 40g missile”
This means I am saying the stat IS 40g for g-tolerance… because it is…
You then go on to insert the separate idea you created in your head that I was saying the missile “pulls like a 40g missile!!!111” like I’m some plebian who again, still thinks g-tolerance is the predominant factor in missile agility.
Asking someone to explain their statement is not normally used as a method of agreement. Especially when the question is done in an open manner such as yours. You should’ve initially specified upper G-tolerance and not left it ambiguos if you wanted to specify that you were arguing with it as a theoretical upper maximum; Given the discussion so far had been on effective turning performance.
Thanks! you! explained! it! very! well!!!
I tried to be simple, theyre different irl but in game at least theyre the same - AAM-3 is just better
Ik exacly what that means but u dont know whats fin aoa
The fact that u only look at the stat card says it all about u
How do you come to this conclusion? Genuinely crazy
Cuz u said this is a 40g missile
Which is not
It pulls 1 or 2 more gs then 9m
Because the g-tolerance is, in fact, 40g. What do you think this stat means exactly?
G limit?
Like it says?
And how can u tolerance 40gs if u cant reach them?
AAM-3 is best to use on the 15J and 15MJ