China already has 2 13.7s, they don’t need their only 12.7 removed from its BR.
@SoloWing_Makarov
Japan has no effective CAS options at this time above BR 5.3.
T-4 doesn’t have any ordnance, it’s unarmed. Even if T-4 was armed, it would be ~6.3 in BR, no where close to Alpha Jet equivalent.
EJ Kai doesn’t have JDAMs IRL
GCS-1s model means nothing. You can’t use models, you use active code.
A-10C can carry GBU-39s… flight manual my dude.
And your last sentence is hilariously wrong about TV guidance.
You have to research things before posting next time.
@StanSm1th_싸움
You don’t play Japan and you likely hate Thailand, so why do you care?
Those of us that play Japan want this diversity Thailand [and hopefully Indonesia in the future] add to the game.
Also the fact your post claims diversity isn’t diversity… obvious bait.
Wonder how many more “last messages” we’re gonna get from you. You want to be taken seriously? Don’t go blasting insults the very second someone says something you disagree with. You entered a civil discussion and turned into an insultfest. You talk about others being fragile? Look at yourself, man.
@StanSm1th_싸움
Your posts came in here with anger and vitriol toward others while being dismissive of basic facts as well as what people want.
Keep claiming that diversity destroys games while War Thunder’s competition is losing players to War Thunder because of said diversity and realism.
I don’t think I’m anyone other than myself.
I do have memories of hundreds of opinions from people in regards to many topics, this one included.
@SoloWing_Makarov
Only F-2A is capable of using JDAMs, EJ Kai was never integrated.
And no, I’m not taking your bait to get banned. Go find the documents yourself, you’re the one making exclusively false claims.
Anyway, it’s incredible how, in an attempt to help a nation objectively disadvantaged in terms of aviation, the developers managed to displease everyone. All my sympathy to the players from Japan, but once again the issue of persistent disparity in treatment and lack of balance among existing trees emerges when such initiatives are taken. A success—what else can be said?
No insults? I guess “uneducated hateful fanboys” was a compliment then.
You’ve gone completely mad, hateful. You entered a normal discussion and went nuts. I will not reply to you anymore, and unlike you, I will keep my word. I suggest you do the same, you said it was your last post here like 5 replies ago.
Guys you’re derailing the thread with this. If you want to keep on with the discussion i would highly suggest to bring it to PMs. Furthermore, the language that we are supposed to be using in this thread is English, so keep it that way.
This all sounds like it could be a cultural misunderstanding (but i might be wrong).
Some of the words you have used in this thread are indeed often seen as demeaning and/or insulting in a lot of countries.
For example:
Calling someone uneducated is in many countries an insult and is often used as a way of saying that someone is an “idiot” or calling them “stupid” without actually saying it.
I’m not saying that is what you ment, it’s just that that is how many will read it.
If you want to discuss this you are free send me a private message.
So, a question. I don’t know if anyone has asked this yet, so apologies if did.
A while back, we saw the removal of the Tiger 2 105mm, Panther 2, and Coelian from the German tech tree. It was on the basis of them being paper/fictional/functionally impossible (depending on which tank) as well as WT’s expansion into the cold war and beyond lessening the need for those vehicles.
So, with the addition of the Thai aviation subtree, would we see the removal of aircraft like the F-16AJ, R2Y2 V2, and V3 in the future, since one is a poster aircraft and the latter 2 are just artists concepts? I imagine the new subtree somewhat lessens the need for these to be around somewhat.
it still turns out to be unfair that 2 countries have already received through subtrees what China could have received a year ago along with the J-11, in order to have both a current high-tier fighter and a multi-role aircraft for the GRB/GSB
If China received a current 13.7 fighter with the arrival of the J-10A, then it still does not have a current multi-role aircraft, although it would have cost the gaijins nothing to introduce it, but in the end, for some reason, China introduced the Mirage-2000 instead of it, given the availability of a better aircraft (J-10A)…
I support the removal of these aircraft, the F-16AJ at least. The reason Japan got the F-16AJ was, in my opinion, to give Japan at least some top tier CAS. This will not be needed anymore.