ItO 2005: The Real ASRAD-R (Replacing or supplementing In-game)

[Would you like to see this in-game?]
  • Yes
  • No
0 voters

DISCLAIMER: This is taken from my Finnish Ground Forces Sub-tree for Sweden. I added it to the Swedish tree due to the ASRAD-R already existing in-game, SAAB (Swedish Defense Company) participation in the creation of the ASRAD-R platform, as well as already having the Finnish ItO 90M in the Swedish tree.

ItO 2005: The Real ASRAD-R (Replacing or Supplementing In-game)

ItO_2005_Unimog_5000_Lippujuhlan_p%C3%A4

Imagery/Media

16 Likes

Voted yes. I was so sad to see this unique and actually in-service version being disregarded in favour of a generic M113.

5 Likes

This could be foldered or added at 11.0, it would be a pretty solid vehicle I am just wondering if there is upgrades to turret rotation and elevation also further upgrade to the IR tracking?

1 Like

+1, even if ahistorical gaijin should add extra ammo in the hull for balance’s sake

5 Likes

Fixed the broken images and some information.

We don’t need that anymore, with the addition of ammo-crates. :)

8 total missiles is still comedically bad considering certain (german) sam sites with up to 24+ shots
(Idk how many ammo boxes they get)

Do you happen to have photos of it with the launcher down? I can’t find any anywhere I look

That german system is also quite a higher BR than this one will ever be. :)

True, just annoyed about a certain 4 missile AA that is entirely outclassed :\

think both launch vehicles get 1 crate each, so 32 total

1 Like

Love the look of this thing. Realistically you’d reckon they would ofc store some extra ammo, even if it’s unknown, 4 more wouldn’t hurt for balance. +1

There’s also an ammo crate reload don’t forget

+1 but i think the old one should be foldered and not removed

1 Like

Hell yes +1 to real good stuff

@Thomas_Belgium
Is there a way we can get some actual attention on this?

As a suggestion moderator I can review and potentially approve the suggestion, but what the developers actually read is out of our hands as moderators. We do know that several developers are active on the forums, and some do read the suggestions in the Suggestions section… The best shot at guaranteed developer attention is getting it to the " Passed " stage and that depends entirely on the suggestion moderators (us) suggesting some suggestions ourselves, but not every nation or vehicle gets a chance each time. Asking us to pass it on won’t help. This vehicle might possibly have been up and running for the passed to the developers, but we do look at all suggestions for a nation and try to find the nicest or best for War Thunder.

1 Like

Thanks for the rundown, I was unsure of the official method!

What can be done to make this reach suggestion standards?