What is the argument even for here?
You completely missed at first and the second you got on targets and your rounds started connecting he was immediately obliterated.
Im so confused about what the nitpicking over fuel tanks even is because the enemy plane was dead in less than half a second from the rounds first connecting.
Whole lot of argument over nothing.
Idk lol my aim was terrible. That was the worst example I could find.
Not by any margin compared to .50s.
It matters enough that in 2014-2015 people begged for .50s to be nerfed in fuel ignition, 2016 the rounds were terrible enough that people were calling ground targets as the “best belt” in the the game because API-T basically lost all incendiary effect.
Not when used by me or 99% of the other people in this thread compared to you.
Wow a whole 10 years ago. Im sure thats relevant to today.
Whaddya know, in the bomber DM thread for the new update, the stuff Killakiwi and I kvetched about DOES matter since it’s rearing it’s head in way people didn’t expect. WOWZERS
In what way? The foremost issue is still the fictionally unkillable bombers.
Fuel tanks not catching fire from anything that would realistically catch them on fire in a reasonable amount of time. DM’s having sections incapable of breaking due to how they are modeled.
Y’know, the small stuff.
this only happens because they hugely reduced fire chance and fire damage on dev bombers
in 99% of other planes, damage simply overflows to the next part (and then breaks that too because they don’t each have a trillion hp and don’t eat missiles). which is how with live server bombers you can kill them by shooting unbreakable parts enough.
You mean the thing I was talking about that’s been happening.
“It doesn’t exist until I have a problem with it.”
On live server? not happening at all
Yes. If I shoot someone, and at least half the time they go down in flames, there is no shortage of fire chance.
now go do the same with the dev bombers