Nothing bad about what I have said. If someone writes something like he did there is no point in discussion as it is clear on what his mind is fixated on.
Should I care about what 90% people tell me or what my own experience in this vehicles tell me? I’m able to play all vehicles listed and do it well.
Lol why don’t you answer, the point is valid even if I was in the M-26 and you were in the IS-4m eating a sandwich or sipping your coffee, the M-26 can’t do anything against those, maybe just shoot the barrel. M-26 vs Maus, again totally fair I don’t see anything wrong here.
1: You can employ an IS-2s playstyle with tanks like the Super Pershing and Tiger II H and do WAY better.
2: 1.2 hp/ton traded over things like the T26E5, with almost double the armor.
4: Fair, your mind is also fixated
5: Mhm, and you should be able to CLEARY tell that both the IS-2 and M26 are inferior tanks
I expect better from a player like you
With super pershing it is somehow possible but still is not as good as with IS-2.
Still bette mobility.
Because I have played both and did well, that is why I know what is a better heavy tank.
Belive in what You want, I couldn’t care less. I played all this vehicles which can be seen in my profile in game and did well. If You can’t understand a simple things, then You just need to learn in Your own time.
Nah maybe he’s right, Maus and IS-6 potentially facing M-26 is totally balanced, we just have a massive skill issue if we can’t deal with those in our M-26 with its shitty apcr
1: And the E5? can bounce the IS-4s 122 if that volumetric hellhole doesnt work
2: Lmao, the super pershing does everything the IS-2 does but better
3: If you insist, although it is NEGLIGIBLE
4: It’s pretty clear you’re only defending either tank because of an egotistical problem
5: ^
With M26 You can still destroy things like Maus and IS-4M frontally.
But it doesn’t have a certain characteristics that allows it to work like IS-2 which is required for again certain kind of playstyle.
K.
Again, belive in what You want, I just say how things are in game.
Oh no! I’m defending tanks that I know how to use and talk about how things are in game from a perspective of someone who have used all this vehicles! Such an egoistical problem I have!
I call BS on that armor analysis, to do that in game would be problematic to say the least, even from the side the IS-4 is heavily armored, yeah, the Pershing is hopeless
Are you suggesting that the M-26 or the T-44, let’s not forget about the T-44 too, would completely dominate in a downtier if they were 6.3?I mean, to me it would be more problematic for an M26 or a T-44 to kill an IS-6 than it is for a panzer IV G to kill a Pershing or a T-44, but I may be wrong