Absolutely Not, if they did we would already have 12.3 for ground arcade and realistic but i will assume gaijin just don’t know what they are gonna do with the vacuum which will be left afterwards
@Calerid
In what world is it “disinformation” to imply that Leclerc can use different ammo types?
I edited the original post so it’s no longer implied, but explicitly stated.
Type 10, T-90, and other autoloaders share similar systems for their fire control systems [computers].
@Bossman919
Thanks for proving I implied Leclerc can have multiple different types of rounds with that screenshot.
You know, some people could hop in and think people are just trying to close the topic and protect the 2S38 over their agreement with me that the Leclerc can hold multiple different types of ammo.
All as an example that a single feed point doesn’t limit ammo selection nearly as much as the person I responded to.
States facts about Leclerc, Bossman provides evidence.
I clarify my statements to further cement my claim that Leclerc can use different types of ammo.
Gets attacked despite both Bossman and I saying the same thing.
Said evidence Bossman provided that proves Leclerc can use different types of ammo:
explain how a single round loader in this case leclerc or type 90/10 choose which round they fire then it gets loaded, something that IS NOT possible with the 2s38 because of single belt like feeding mechanism :)
do they unload the entire feed mechanism and restock it with the shell they want to fire ?
there is a reason that most tanks with a auto cannon have double feed mechanism, so they CAN CHOOSE what they fire.
2S38 doesn’t use belted ammo.
The ammo position is known to the computer system either manually or via sensors, and that info is used for combat.
Leclerc, Type 10, T-90, etc, despite having a single feed point, allows for multiple ammo choices that are programmed into its FCS.
Belted ammo or clip/mag fed you need multiple feed points.
And there are hundreds of vehicles which I don’t play and don’t comment on, and I’m doing just fine.
If everyone stopped commenting on vehicles they’d never played, 90% of all falsehoods being spread would disappear. It’s the main cause for so much bad information around.
I get the feeling you didn’t pay attention to the other person asking for someone to literally be banned because he hadn’t played enough games in a vehicle yet.
It’s amusing that you’re taking issue with me, and not that person.
Okay, on to the blacklist you go.
There clearly isn’t any worthwhile conversation to be had.
Yes increase BR so i will be taking KA-50 into every single match and nuking your tanks from orbit as a thank you for killing my 10.0 lineup. Will you be happy then?
2S38 is only a problem if you are an idiot that exposes your sides to the enemy and it happens way too often on more open maps people are so careless and drive without using binos all around them. In city maps 2S38 dies instantly to the enemies due lack of mobility.
Even if you move it to 11.7 it will still be great against rushers but will be even more useless against frontal encounters vs mbts.
People are so bad that this game that doesn’t even carry a few HEATFS/HE/HESH shells to destroy 2S38 in a single hit.
Your personal inability to recognize vehicle characteristics does not restrict other users from using critical thinking to understand vehicle performance.